Aqua 'La Diva' ($9k) or Gryphon 'Ethos' ($39k) versus. Pro-Ject CD Box RS2 T ($3k)?


What sensible rationale is there for buying either of the two above-mentioned VERY COSTLY CD spinners (Aqua ’La Diva,’ a CD-only transport, and the Gryphon ’Ethos,’ a CD player with built-in DAC) when we can get the same pure Red-Book CD digital output from the Pro-Ject CD Box RS2 T for FAR less money?

What is a potential buyer getting for their significantly increased expenditure other than fancy packaging and possibly a boost to their egos from ownership of a prestige brand-name item? The one component (and a crucially-significant one at that) which all three of these products have in common is the new Philips-based Stream Unlimited CD Pro 8 CD player mechanism. Aside than that, what one appears to get with the two far-higher-priced components is little more than pure window-dressing, not substantive gains in performance over the CD Box RS2 T.

It is little wonder that one reviewer of the RS2 T thinks of it as nothing less than a "giant killer," in that it makes it nearly impossible for any level-headed purchaser, even one with the means to spend lavishly, to rationalize spending thousands of dollars more on these two competing products (or on others like them) when one can get the same sonic results (which from most reports are splendid) from the humble little CD Box.

Any thoughts? Do we audiophiles finally have good reason to come to our buying senses? To me, Pro-Ject Audio Systems may have struck a true winning vein with their CD Box when prospecting for gold.

erictal4075

Showing 3 responses by tommylion

Something I’d like to figure out; is the lack of the ability to program CD tracks inherent to the CD Pro 8 mechanism, or is it just a “feature”  of the Pro-Ject RS2T?

Virtually every player/transport since the dawn of CD has been programmable. It is one of the key advantages the format has over LPs or tape. Sure, some people don’t use, or care about, this feature, but having it available for those who do doesn’t hurt them in any way. Honestly, if it was a deliberate decision, I think it’s a pretty stupid one. I think the more likely scenario is that someone messed up, and they decided to act like it was deliberate, or no big deal, instead of fixing it.


The reports of this transport’s sound quality obviously have me very interested. If it had track programming, I’d be all over it. Yes, I value sound quality over features, but the omission of such a basic feature, that I highly value, and can’t see having any negative impact on sound quality, is hard to swallow.

It is just frustrating from my perspective that Pro-Ject came so close to hitting a grand slam in terms of what I’m looking for in a CD transport, but then messed it up with an error or bad decision. Including track programming for those who want and appreciate it is a no-brainer, IMO. If it doesn’t impact sound quality, what's the downside?