Aqua 'La Diva' ($9k) or Gryphon 'Ethos' ($39k) versus. Pro-Ject CD Box RS2 T ($3k)?


What sensible rationale is there for buying either of the two above-mentioned VERY COSTLY CD spinners (Aqua ’La Diva,’ a CD-only transport, and the Gryphon ’Ethos,’ a CD player with built-in DAC) when we can get the same pure Red-Book CD digital output from the Pro-Ject CD Box RS2 T for FAR less money?

What is a potential buyer getting for their significantly increased expenditure other than fancy packaging and possibly a boost to their egos from ownership of a prestige brand-name item? The one component (and a crucially-significant one at that) which all three of these products have in common is the new Philips-based Stream Unlimited CD Pro 8 CD player mechanism. Aside than that, what one appears to get with the two far-higher-priced components is little more than pure window-dressing, not substantive gains in performance over the CD Box RS2 T.

It is little wonder that one reviewer of the RS2 T thinks of it as nothing less than a "giant killer," in that it makes it nearly impossible for any level-headed purchaser, even one with the means to spend lavishly, to rationalize spending thousands of dollars more on these two competing products (or on others like them) when one can get the same sonic results (which from most reports are splendid) from the humble little CD Box.

Any thoughts? Do we audiophiles finally have good reason to come to our buying senses? To me, Pro-Ject Audio Systems may have struck a true winning vein with their CD Box when prospecting for gold.

erictal4075

Showing 4 responses by lalitk

I don’t know why Gryphon Ethos is part of this discussion. As a one box solution, Gryphon Ethos with a built in DAC is a ultimate choice for anyone with means. On a scale of 10, it’s a 11 once you consider its aesthetics and performance. I’m not trying to justify its asking price but one shouldn’t overlook its intended audience.
I would put Ethos right next to the likes of analog player’s from Tech Das :-)

As far as La Diva, one needs to hear La Diva with Formula xHD DAC to appreciate its virtues especially through their proprietary i2S AQLink.

I am sure RS2 offers great value and performance. And it’s performance can be further enhanced and appreciated by the associated DAC’s….and folks, when it comes to DAC, sky is the limit in terms of performance and price.

“Transports and servers are crucial partners and their level of quality matters.”

@charles1dad

I am in complete agreement. I love to own a player like Ethos or La Diva but instead I’ve taken a slightly different approach to digital playback. Instead of relying on CD transports, I bought a high quality CD ripper with SSD storage last year. After extensive A/B, I could not discern any audible differences between a CD playback and the ripped tracks of the same albums played through my DAC. BTW, I am still buying CD’s that offers superior recording quality and ripping them to SSD for playback :-)

Late last year, I’ve upgraded my DAC that eliminated the need for a external server or streamer. It has also eliminated the need to rely on vulnerable digital protocols like USB, AES or SPDIF. I couldn’t be any happier!

“I get "purposeful." High-quality manner ripping??? Please explain....”

@david_ten

IMO, The differentiator is Aurender’s proprietary CD ripping software, which is custom engineered to work with ACS100 internal high-quality TEAC CD-ROM drive. The ripping software’s sophisticated error detection and correction ensures accurate rips that are technically superior to rips made on a general purpose computer. One can argue that a PC or laptop CD-ROM drive is perfectly capable of bit perfect rips but we both know results can possibly varies by ways of how these identical processes of CD ripping are executed to nth degree.