@deep_333 Not at all! Many units out there give you the ability to adjust delay. The Aussies call it launch time. These include units by DEQX, Anthem, MiniDSP and Trinnov. It is an absolute necessity for sub integration.
Anyone else excited for this Borresen subwoofer?!!!
It seems quite unique...(as one might expect from Michael B).
Borresen Subwoofer - Michael Borresen Interview
- ...
- 32 posts total
@mijostyn Are all your sources digitized? @phusis I had one of Tom's tinnitus inducing Tech 7 ServoDrive belt drive horns with the band for a few weeks. Brought it in the house and ran the source through the Velodyne's Rap EQ preset, OMG! I hate to criticize anything I haven't actually listened to at home or at least on a familiar system. On the other hand there were some phrases coming from Mr. Borresen that triggered my yada whada? too. As a Double Bassist a single or 6 pack of -6dB sub-bass systems just don't go low. |
Post removed |
Correction: presumably I was incorrect about the Borresen sub principle and it only utilizing the front wave of the woofer cones. They look to be mounted in a folded-baffle design (a so-called "RiPol" after Alex Ridtahler, short for Ridtahler Dipole) that radiates both front and aft in a directional pattern - i.e.: the backside of the cones "shoot" into the open-to-the-back dual chambers - and thus necessitates a free-standing position. Inherently low efficient, but by all accounts (very much dependent it seems on accurate positioning) delivering a very clean "coming from nowhere" bass, also very suitable it appears in conjunction with planar/ESL main speakers. Interesting principle for a number of reasons, but less so for my requirements in particular. Sorry about the confusion. @deep_333 wrote:
The buzzwords here are "purist hifi" and "analog," but as poster @mijostyn points to delay can be done in the digital domain (the non-purist approach, god forbid), even more accurately and expansively with a separate, quality DSP unit that can also be more sonically transparent than most analog solutions (not least omitting the passive crossover), and if the same DSP section affects the whole frequency range actively the inherent delay of the unit affects the different driver sections equally. What’s considered "purist" in the Borresen way or general sense of audiophilia is usually only so in a limited context (i.e.: analog vs. digital), and so I’ll glad incorporate quality digital where it makes a lot of sense, apply a purist oriented approach elsewhere and try and see the forest for the trees more clearly. @m-db wrote:
I read of those, allegedly they were SPL-beast (and then some) but according to sources also somewhat unreliable?
Good point.
Yeah, the sub principle at hand at its core certainly isn’t unique, it appears, though hardly widespread in use either. I’ve heard similar rhetorics from Borresen and others with more or less grandstanding notions, and yet the physical framework where speakers go, as usual, is stunted. One can only do so much from a restricted outset.
Perhaps a physically more all-out open baffle tower sub system would be the way to go (multiple 12" woofers or bigger), albeit taking up more space into the heights and without being SPL- or extension-monsters all the same.. |
@m-db Yes, every last one. The phono stage is run balanced into a Lynx Hilo, a studio ADC/DAC/switcher/digital gain controller type thing. The Hilo is then connected to a DEQX Pre8 by an AES EBU cable. The DEQX is a new digital processor/preamp with a 4 way digital crossover, bass management, parametric EQ, room control and streaming via a Volumio processor. I use Qobuz. @phusis If you want accurate bass open baffle subwoofers are the last thing you want to do. You do need multiple drivers to get anywhere, but in a sealed system preferable arrayed as a line source. Line sources project power and minimize room interaction. The problem as always with subwoofers is putting the drivers into enclosures that are not musical instruments. |
- 32 posts total