(Repeat from my comments on another Gallo Ref 3 thread:)
I have been living with the Ref 3's for a couple of weeks now. They are fantastically open and revealing in my system.
In fact, they sound too prominent in the upper mids/lower treble in my room. (I have used the tweeter switch to taper off the HF response a couple of dB, too.) Because of power sources, I have to place the speakers at the short wall and fire them along the long wall. This may cause a first reflection room interaction that accentuates the upper mids. The 300 degree-disispersion tweeters may need more "breathing room" than the 32 inches (to the side walls) I am giving them. Despite the open-celled, rippled foam I have placed at those
reflection points, I still hear a fatiguing, forward, (shouty") upper-mid prominence.
Does anybody else have a similar problem with the Gallos?
Putting the upper mid-prominence aside (which may be unique to my set up), the Nucleus Ref 3's open up a detailed, light, and airy window on the source material that surprises me---especially for their price. (My reference is the Coincident Super Eclipse.) The sound stage height is in proportion with the whole picture and not an problem for me. It is somewhat like listening from the first row, mezzanine or balcony at a symphony hall---where the sound is often best anyway--and looking down slightly at the stage. Lowering the listening position compensates for this--if you don't like it.
I would like to bring the Gallos to a dealer to test them against other speakers in a different room just to find out what happens. Maybe that upper-mid shouting will be proven to be in my setup only.
I am currently listening to the Gallos with a pair of 95-watt, triode, push-pull mono blocks (Cary SLAM-100s) and also inserted the Berning ZH-270 amp.
Do folks out there have a take on whether the Gallo Ref 3's "like" solid state or tube amps?