@tvad: Thank you for your kind words. Indeed, we supply EMI filters for very broad applications around the world (including Antarctica). Most of top U.S. universities (Caltech, MIT, U.C. Berkeley, and so on) use them in their R&D work. Quantum computing here in the U.S. and in Japan use our filters to be able to work with very weak signals. Nuclear power industry likes our filters too. And, of course, various industrial applications. If you don't meet or exceed published specification, you won't be in business for long... Audio is a relatively small segment for our filters, just FYI.
Regarding impact on sound: EMI filters (such as our CleanSweep) or any power conditioners are not supposed to affect sound in any way except to remove extraneous artifacts, otherwise they become a part of your sound path. If you want to improve sound quality, then perhaps a filter shouldn't be your first choice...
Regarding measurements: people often make critical and/or expensive decisions based on measurements (think of a spot on a CT scan - was it caused by a spike on ground?). Both tools and methodology must be considered and exercised carefully. If you are curious, here is a link to an article I wrote on the subject for inCompliance Magazine, a publication for EMC professionals. Amazon-grade instruments aspire to provide "easy" and meaningful measurements, but you can get only that far on spirit alone without solid engineering foundation. Their typical problems are insufficient bandwidth, lack of true peak measurements, and, importantly, missing common-mode measurements (i.e. between Live or Neutral to ground) - just to list a few. This doesn't mean they are useless - any instrument, no matter how sophisticated, has limitations - just don't make surgery plans on that white spot on CT scan measured by Amazon...
Vladimir Kraz/OnFILTER