Another marketing gimmick?
Nope. My intention was not to look knowledgeable at all. You must not think that others do things for the same reasons you do. As for personal attacks, you just mask them (sometimes poorly) in your rebuttals, but they do show. As for mine, it's just snark, making it easy to digest, and out in the open. All the best, Nonoise |
The device I use was developed very specifically for class D audio, not for power supplies, low voltage points of load or RF circuits.Yes, others use GaN devices but not the ones he worked on with the supplier and he bought out all the inventory. I don't know where you got the notion that the circuit is obsolete unless it was meant to demean. He's devising a new one to deal with the increased power of his next amp. Going back down in power doesn't appear to involve modifications. That, and although other makes use some form of GaN device, they're not intended for audio, like his are. And, yes, I took some poetic license in saying that it was for radar as I was lazy to not list all the other applications. You're quite the pill, aren't you? All the best, Nonoise |
OMG, you guys are becoming a cult. That's just an aesthetic take on a what reviewers say is a great sounding amp. It's a Gallium nitride power FET device that only the maker has access to, since he designed it. All other GaN devices are for radar and if used for audio, are modified or backward engineered. It replaces silicon devices as it's way faster. Here's a review of it: https://6moons.com/audioreview_articles/agdproductions/ The reason he put it in a tube is, wait for it, he's somewhat an artist as well as an engineer. All the best, Nonoise |
