Thanks, Fred!
It seems there are several approaches to address the system / room interface issues:
1. Using an equalizer such as the Accuphase you mentioned or the Rives. This has the disadvantage of usually having some negative side-effects on the quality of the sound.
2. Chosing a system that works well in the room: speaker size, speaker design, and corresponding compatible amp / sources. This has the disadvantage of being hard to predict, requiring lots of trial and error, and perhaps limits the listener to a system sound that they may not prefer - all else being equal.
3. Treating the room with reflectors and absorbers. This has the disadvantage of being aesthetically unappealing as well as being very difficult to do well.
4. Designing and building (or choosing) a room that works well for music. This has the disadvantage of being expensive and often requiring a dedicated space.
Many people (especially here on Audiogon :-) like iterating through systems using approach #2. Perhaps the most reasonable approach is:
#5. Using all four approaches in moderation: using equalization as required for only the most severe problems; choosing a system that has a decent chance of sounding good in the space; adding a minimal amount of reflecting and absorbing material to optimize the room; and starting off with a room that has a good chance of being a good environment for playing music.
Thanks again. It is really cool that the Wisdoms have SO MUCH flexibility so that they can be tailored both for the room and the owner's personal tastes. Cool.
-Mike.
It seems there are several approaches to address the system / room interface issues:
1. Using an equalizer such as the Accuphase you mentioned or the Rives. This has the disadvantage of usually having some negative side-effects on the quality of the sound.
2. Chosing a system that works well in the room: speaker size, speaker design, and corresponding compatible amp / sources. This has the disadvantage of being hard to predict, requiring lots of trial and error, and perhaps limits the listener to a system sound that they may not prefer - all else being equal.
3. Treating the room with reflectors and absorbers. This has the disadvantage of being aesthetically unappealing as well as being very difficult to do well.
4. Designing and building (or choosing) a room that works well for music. This has the disadvantage of being expensive and often requiring a dedicated space.
Many people (especially here on Audiogon :-) like iterating through systems using approach #2. Perhaps the most reasonable approach is:
#5. Using all four approaches in moderation: using equalization as required for only the most severe problems; choosing a system that has a decent chance of sounding good in the space; adding a minimal amount of reflecting and absorbing material to optimize the room; and starting off with a room that has a good chance of being a good environment for playing music.
Thanks again. It is really cool that the Wisdoms have SO MUCH flexibility so that they can be tailored both for the room and the owner's personal tastes. Cool.
-Mike.