Am I crazy - tube pre-amp with receiver??


Hi - I am a newbie (but avid reader of this forum). I have a newbie-like question which arose from some extrapolating I am doing.

I hear you can use the TAD-150 pre-amp with the TA-30 Integrated amp, by using the TA-150 as input to the TA-30, and just leaving the volume knob of the T-30 turned up. I hear that this is supposed to provide some sort of benefit over using the TA-30 alone. What one gets outside of remote control is not clear to me - but I digress . .

I have an old Harman/Kardon 3400 reciver, who's remote control no longer works.

Now - what would happen if I plugged something like the TAD-150 pre-amp into the H/K, and used by H/K as an amp (just keep the volume turned up)? The desired result is to improve performance, incrementally work towards a better system, and regain my remote control.

Would this work? Would I see any benefit?

This weekend, I was told by a stereo salesperson that one could get the majority of tube amplification benefits by going with a tube pre-amp / SS amplifier. So I am putting 2 and 2 together here, possibly to only get 1. Ha.

Regardless, the whole point is to incrementally upgrade - and this is one way I came up with. Thoughts? Is this stupid / insane / waste of time & money?
matthew_s

Showing 1 response by bigjoe

hey matthew,i wouldnt leap to the conclusion that your hk dont have a preamp in,i vaugly remember that model reciever & i do believe it has it.

what your lookin for will not be a regular looking input but 2 side by side inputs that are coupled from the factory with "jumpers" that look kinda like big ass staples.

if you have these jumpers you simply unplug the jumpers which will disconnect your preamp section from the power amp section & plug your new preamp into the power amp section in place of the jumpers & your in like flynn.

i gotta believe the tad will be a huge improvement from the built in stock pre section in the hk reciever.

dont be afraid to try some creepy stuff with what you allready have as john tracy pointed out in the above post sometimes the goofiest stuff ends up being the best sounding.

mike.