Allnic OTL/OCL Phono vs Allnic DHT


I’ve owned both the Allnic DHT phono stage and now the newer OTL/OCL phono, and to my ears, the OTL is simply on another level.

The DHT was impressive—open, natural, and full of that classic tube warmth. But the OTL not only brings greater transparency, speed, and clarity—it somehow retains the same warmth and richness of the DHT, but does it better. It feels more refined, more coherent, and more emotionally engaging without sacrificing any of that organic beauty.

I’m curious—has anyone else here made the comparison? Did you find the OTL to be a clear step forward, or did you prefer the DHT’s character?

Would love to hear your impressions.

phantom_av

Regardless of the design wizardry Allnic employed in the OTL/OCL phonostage, I find it to be noticeably quieter than the DHT — and far easier to live with in terms of maintenance, operation, and day-to-day running. Cartridge loading flexibility is effortless, and the noise floor is effectively nonexistent.

With the older DHT 8000, I often battled microphonics and an occasional quirk where the soundstage would lean subtly to one side. Achieving a rock-solid, dead-centre image could be frustrating, requiring constant fussing with tubes and fine adjustments. The H10,000 OTL series has been the complete opposite: it simply warms up and is ready to make music, no drama, no fiddling.

What really stands out is the leap in performance: transparency, microdetail retrieval, tonal accuracy, soundstage precision, and dynamic range all surpass the DHT 8000 — which I had always regarded as an exceptionally musical phono stage in its own right. The H10,000 series feels several levels higher on the ladder.

Bass is no longer a touch overripe; instead, it extends deeper with greater control. Vocals have gained refinement without losing body and presence, while the highs are sweeter, more polished, and free of any edge — delivering a presentation that’s both revealing and inviting.


 

For much less money, though I don’t know the current retail price, the Atmasphere MP1 will give you similar results. Two differences: the MP1 does not use a SUT to achieve high phono gain, and the Allnic affords 4 pairs of phono inputs vs one pair on the MP1. Important also, the MP1 is fully balanced with an OCL/OTL linestage built in

@lewm      As Phantom audio is an Atma-sphere dealer, I'm sure he can test your hypothesis for himself. I, for one, would love to hear the unbiased results of such a comparison.

I’ve lived with both the Atma-Sphere MP-1 and MP-3, each with the built-in phono stage, and honestly, they’re both great in their own way. The MP-1 has that beautiful transparency and dynamic punch Atma-Sphere is known for — it really lets the music breathe. But for my own taste, the Allnic just speaks to me more. It’s got this gorgeous tonality, real weight to the notes, and a richness that makes me want to keep listening for hours.

The H-10,000 especially is a joy to live with — super quiet, really flexible, and easy to integrate into my system. The built-in SUT is a nice touch, even if you don’t need it, because it avoids extra cables and the colouration they can bring. Being silver-wired, it’s very open and detailed, but it never sounds thin; it’s still full-bodied and musical.

Just to be clear, I’m only talking about how the Allnic DHT phono compares to the OTL here — I’m not trying to make it an Atma-Sphere vs. Allnic battle.