Aging and Treble and Income?


I'm in my late 50s; been listening to, and playing, music for most of my life. I still occasionally haunt the salons, but these days not to buy new gear; more just curiosity about developments in our wonderful hobby. These days I just buy music; records, CDs and the odd download.
I was listening to a very expensive system recently, a combination of an excellent digital front end, feeding an exotic tube array of components, and outputting via a beautifully constructed set of English high-end speakers.
A very impressive sound to say the least. Not like real music though: very very good hi-fi, but not real.
One of the obvious oddities was the frequency response above maybe 4k. Just incorrect. Very clear, very emphasised and incisive, no doubt, but not right.
And it occured to me that this isn't unusual. And then a set of questions came to me. For the purposes of this debate I will exclude the 128k iPod generation - their tastes in listening are their own, and as much driven by budget as space constraint as anything else. I prefer to concentrate on the generation that has increased leisure and disposable income. It's a sad fact that this generation is plagued by the inevitability of progressive hearing loss, most often accompanied by diminished ability to hear higher frequencies. But it's this generation that can afford the 'best' equipment.

My question is simply this: is it not possible (or highly likely) that the higher-end industry is driven by the need to appeal to those whose hearing is degrading? In other words, is there a leaning towards the building-in of a compensatory frequency emphasis in much of what is on the shelves? My question is simplistic, and the industry may indeed be governed by the relentless pursuit of accuracy and musicality, but so much that I have hear is, I find, very difficult to listen to as it is so far from what I believe to be reality. Perhaps there has always been an emphasis in making our sytems sound "exciting" as opposed to "honest": I can understand the pleasure in this pursuit, as it's the delight in technology itself and I see nothing very wrong in that. But, all this emphasised treble....I just wonder if anyone out there in cyberspace agrees with me?
57s4me

Showing 3 responses by nonoise

I saw the Monkees play before they hit it big big at a Columbia Studios family Easter day gathering way back when. They sounded good enough from what I can remember.

They hit it big soon after and I was a big fan of their TV show. My dad and Davy Jones were on the same bowling team. I wish I still had that picture of Davy Jones sitting on my dad's lap at the bowling lanes with the rest of the team, both grinning and holding bears. Good memories.

All the best,
Nonoise
I've noticed a tendency towards brightness at some displays at the last audio show I went to (the Newport Audio Show). I thought it an anomaly until I read some reports and one display, in particular was rated as one of the "best in show" and it was too sterile and bright for my taste.

Yes, there was lots of musical information bombarding my ears with detail aplenty, incisive highs, and sound that would cut right through butter. Yet it wasn't involving, organic, music to my ears. It engaged me at first but as I waited to talk to one of the reps, it began to fatigue me and I simply moved on.

All the best,
Nonoise
It wasn't so much that I was a fan. When Columbia Studios had their annual Easter Day family gathering it was on the (now Warner Bros.) backlot and there were lots of activities and things to do.

My family even stood in line to have the 3 Stooges autograph some pictures. I never liked Larry after that as he was rude to my mother after signing stuff all day and asked her if she were some kid. Curly spoke right up and made up for it when he saw the hurt on my mothers face.

The Monkees were playing at the end of the lot were a stage was set up and had a nice crowd.

All the best,
Nonoise