ADC 26 BEST PRITCHARD CARTRIDGE EVER? or BEST CARTRIDGE EVER?
Dear friends: I always said that each day is a learning day and if like me that from several years now think always " out of the box " many of you will find out great rewards that audio always has for us as an unexpected gifts.
Obviously that’s not easy to think " out of the box " because to do that we have to have a different kind of self attitude where between other things we must to forget for ever at least the 50% of all the information we learned through our audio life in the AHEE. With out that " forget " we just can’t do it.
This review is more than an usual audio item review for many reasons I will try to explain over the thread.
First I want to leave very clear my room/audio system main target: STAY TRUER TO THE RECORDING.
To achieve that we have to think that usually the recording microphones are positioned at very near field of the MUSIC sources even like in the 3 Blind Mice recordings: inside the instruments. Recording microphones are not " seated " at 20m-35m. from the source as usually we listen when attend to a live acoustical music event. So we have to have self experiences of live MUSIC seated at near field. If some of us do not have that kind experiences then is very dificult to understand what I’m talking about here and elsewhere.
OK, the ADC 26 cartridge is a vintage Induced Magnet invented motor design by Peter Pritchard ( that pass away. ), it’s not a MM or MI or MC kind of cartridge design. Here you can read about and on his patent and a little of his audio life history:
As you can see and read all seems very old and rudimentary with really humble cartridge specs ( nothing spectacular down there. ) where the elliptical stylus is: 0.03 x 0.07.
The ADC 25 red dot stylus ( exist the red blue 0.03 x 0.09 and the white dot. ) is similar to the 26 and the ADC 27 change is that is the same 26 stylus type but nude. I own all those models that comes with the same cartridge body but different color and where the cartridge motor in the 26 and 27 is similar and the cartridge differs only in the stylus and that the compliance instead 50 cu as in the 25 and 26 is " only " 40cu.
All these cartridges are my oldest ones ( comes from the 60’s. ) that I bougth years ago when started the very long MM Agon thread and I remember that I mentioned there the 25 and 26 but almost no one took cares about not even me because I really never gave it the enougth listening time to those cartridges and was only like a month ago that I really discovery this fenomenal, outstanding, astonishing and " perfect " performer.
When you listen it you are not listen as if was alike MM/MI/electrect cartridges but more as a live event/truer to the recording with some characteristics only shared for the best of the best LOMC cartridges.
I made my self developed evaluation proccess where I’m deep trained and is almost " bullet proof ".
The best MM/MI cartridge is with out doubt the AKG P100LE followed by Astatic MF-2500 and others as the JVC X1MK2 or the Technics EPC 100CMK4 but no one of them can even the quality performance levels of the ADC 26. The ADC is in a different league " the major league ".
I compared the 26/27 against the Colibri, Ortofon A95, Lyra Etna, My Sonic Labs Supereminent ( I think ? ? ) Dynavector XV-1s, Clearaudio Goldfinger and some other vintage top MC designs. No one of them beats overall the ADC 26.
The main 26 characteristics to beat belongs at both frequency extremes where if we want first rate quality performance there first condition is the transient response/attack of the music notes and develops of harmonics along the decay timing that’s where exist clear differences in between MC cartridges and all the other kind of designs. Nothing but the 26/27 compares with a top LOMC cartridges in those regards.
The transient response and fast timing decay in the low of the bass range is second to none and " mimic " what we can listen in a live event at nearfield position. With out this " sole " characteristic MUSIC as MUSIC just can’t exist and is here where belongs the MUSIC foundation. At the other frequency extreme things are more of the bass range quality performance. In both frequency range it’s not only the rigthness of the transient response but the notes definition its very clear distinction in between and its harmonics. Exist no overhang or bold sound. At the high frequency range ( at the top. ) nothing can beats a Colibri 0.22mv output and the only contender for is precesily these ADC 26/27 ! !
As you can see the 26/27 specs says not very wide frequency range but when listen to it you can sware it goes from 5hz to over 100khz but the more important issue is the clear definition. When the timing in those frequency ranges are spot on then the overall MUSIC rythm is just spectacular and makes and moves all your feelings and body.
We all hear through all our body not only through our ears. We hear through the skin, bones, skind hair and millions of nervous terminations in the body and when you are listening to the ADC 26/27 all those have a true meaning as never before.
What about soundstage, layering, inner detail and the like: just very first rate. Tonal balance is outstanding nothing at the broad wide frequency range tells you " hey: I’m here ", exist a true coherence in between all frequency ranges.
Yes, it’s a UNIQUE listen experience a NEW listen experience coming from a very older cartridge and YES is the best Pritchard design and if you think that you already own the best cartridge ever you need to experience the ADC 26/27. I compared against the best out there in the same system with the same tonearms and same everything.
Was not only me but some other audiophiles friends where at least one of them is a music player. This one is a drummer/batery player and when he was at my place I run ( between other LPs. ) the Sheffield D2D with Ron Tutt and Jim Keltner great drummers with out telling him which cartridge was playing and my friend that’s a true expert with those instruments and golden ear by nature was " jaws dropping " and it’s because is incredible the TRUE of that kind of sound coming from the ADC’s . This recording specially is something to listen through the 26/27 at 95db SPL with peaks in the 100db neigborhood, you can touch the sound and cut it with a sizzers ! ! !. It’s amazing. The ADC never lost its aplomb no matters at what SPL you are listening from 70db to over 95dbs .
Every single good recording " sings " as never before of all what I experienced in my system and several other top audio systems.
One of the best MUSIC LP for testing any audio item is the Telarc 1812 and not because the cannon shots but overall frequency ranges that’s always a challenge for any cartridge andd for any audio system in other frequency ranges than the bass range. No one of the other top LOMC cartridges can even overall the ADC 26/27 quality performance levels in this LP recording in all the frequency range other than the very low bass where the ADC beats to all of them.
I running the ADC 26 at 1.1grs and due ot its very high compliance ( 50cu. ) and cartridge body design is a very low rider when the 27 is only a low rider. As with other top LOMC cartridges the alignment set up is critical but with the ADC 26 we have to do it with the best accuracy we can and with the VTA/SRA tiny/sligthly up at the tonearm bearing. This VTA/SRA is critical and as always not only depends of the accuracy overall set up but room system dependent.
That explosiveness, power, dynamics, transient response, thightness, flow, true tonal balance agresiveness, natural brigthness, rythm that usually exist only in a live MUSIC event with the ADC 26/27 you can feel that never was in your home audio system as nearer as with these ADC cartridges.
Those audiophiles terms as: lush, organic, color, smothness, bold, and the like does not exist through these " truer to the recording " performers. Those audiophiles terms/characteristics of sound just does not exist in the nearfield MUSIC live events are only characteristics " invented by the AHEE and very far away from reality.
The ADC 26/27 as the very top LOMC cartridges are made it for true music lovers more than for " audiophiles ".
I think that in the 60’s the ADC 26/27 you can get fro no more than 80.00 and today can compete against 15K+ LOMC cartridges.
This all new experience through the ADC 26/27 bcartridges came in the best moment when I 'm more mature in all subjects with MUSIC and audio and when my room audio system is at its best with all the up-dates and up-grades I can afford bor the better.
As always your contributions in the thread all are welcomed and appreciated.
do it a favor and don’t follow ignorant people because you will or are contaminated by.
Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS, R.
It comes from the same person who raved about several MM cartridges over the years with exactly the same comments, last time is was the Astatic FM2500 claimed to be "the best of the best" and many other cartridges. In fact NOS EPC100cmk4 was available for sale this year along with several NOS samples of EPC205c mk4, so don’t pretend to be elitist. No one can fix those cartridges, anyone can ask jpjones who is a Technics collector and own many of them including top models. Refurbished cartridges is not what a true collectors looking for, they does NOT have an original "Technics sound" and for this reason there are many better cartridges, an original ones from the same era. J.Carr also commented that there is NO technical advantages in the design of that 100c mk4, there is nothing special in the generator. In my opinion two versions of the AT-ML180 are much better (OFC with gold plated Boron Cantilever and OCC with Gold plated Beryllium cantilever) and there is no problem with suspension at all, some top of the line Grace models (Level II and F-14) are amazing and all of them have exotic Boron cantilevers and much better styli (Micro Ridge), there are more great cartridges from that era too.
What the OP should learn is English language. Many english speaking persons pointed him to the "ignorant" word he used before, but he continue to use it and addressed it to many audiogon members preneding to be a Oracle of High-End, but in fact he’s an egoistic and very rude person. Once he has crossed the red line in communication on puplic forum, no respect anymore!
At the same time he is a person who left unpaid bill for many thousands euros from his ex re-tipper in Germany. It’s been said here on audiogon by another member who knew that re-tipper (now retired) in person. Would you trust this person ? No way.
Instead everyone is free to find the best cartridges to judge them individually. But destroying some unique original cartridges, refurbishing them with different parts is the last thing to do for any serious collectors/audiophiles. For a fans of VdH there are VdH cartridges available new or used.
do it a favor and don’t follow ignorant people because you will or are contaminated by.
All said above by Raul is BS. It comes from the same person who raved about several MM cartridges over the years with exactly the same comments, last time is was the Astatic FM2500 claimed to be "the best of the best" and many other cartridges. In fact NOS EPC100cmk4 was available for sale this year along with several NOS samples of EPC205c mk4, so don’t pretend to be elitist. No one can fix those cartridges, anyone can ask jpjones who is a Technics collector and own many of them including top models. Refurbished cartridges is not what a true collectors looking for, they does NOT have an original "Technics sound" and for this reason there are many better cartridges, an original ones from the same era. J.Carr also commented that there is NO technical advantages in the design of that 100c mk4, there is nothing special in the generator. In my opinion two versions of the AT-ML180 are much better (OFC with gold plated Boron Cantilever and OCC with Gold plated Beryllium cantilever) and there is no problem with suspension at all, some top of the line Grace models (Level II and F-14) are amazing and all of them have exotic Boron cantilevers and much better styli (Micro Ridge), there are more great cartridges from that era too.
What the OP should learn is English language. Many english speaking persons pointed him to the "ignorant" word he used before, but this id**t continue to use it and addressed it to many audiogon members preneding to be a Oracle of High-End, but in fact he’s an egoistic and very rude person. Once he has crossed the red line in communication on puplic forum, no respect anymore!
At the same time he is a person who left unpaid bill for many thousands euros from his ex re-tipper in Germany. It’s been said here on audiogon by another member who knew that re-tipper (now retired) in person. Would you trust this person ? No way.
Instead everyone if free to find the best cartridges to judge them individually. But destroying some unique original cartridges, refurbishing them with different parts is the last thing to do for any serious collectors/audiophiles. For a fans of VdH there are VdH cartridges available new or used.
With the Technics EPC-100 mk4 there is a little screw in the front that you use to unscrew to remove the cantilever/stylus.
Vdh decided to glue the stylus instead of using the the screw, then cut the thread off and glue the screw head so it looked like it had been screwed in. Only when I found a NOS stylus replacement I found out this issue as I could not unscrew the old stylus, until the screw head broke off and I saw the glue.
VdH at no stage asked me or told me what they did to the cartridge
Raul - the VdH re-tip did not sound better. The technics stylus was more detailed and had better frequency extremes. The VdH was a little more rounded with less extenion at both ends - was this part due to them fcuken gluing the stylus into cartridge body - I will never know.
Personally I would not PISS on Van Den Hul. You only have to look at the issues he has with his own cartridges over the years.
and Raul - Yes I got two wonderful carts with the technics and AT25 - but also a draw full of very ordinary MM carts. I do like the Elac DN 795E a lot as well.
All said above is BS that comes from the same person who raved about several MM cartridges over the years with exactly the same comments, last time is was the Astacis FM2500 claimed to be "the best of the best" and many other cartridges. In fact NOS EPC100cmk4 was available for sale this year along with several NOS samples of EPC205c mk4, so don’t pretend to be elitist. No one can fix those cartridges, anyone can ask jpjones who is a Technics collector and own many of them including top models. Refurbished cartridges is not what a true collectors looking for, they does NOT have an original "Technics sound" and for this reason there are many better cartridges, an original ones from the same era. J.Carr also commented that there is NO technical advantages in the design of that 100c mk4, there is nothing special in the generator. In my opinion two versions of the AT-ML180 are much better (OFC with gold plated Boron Cantilever and OCC with Gold plated Beryllium cantilever) and there is no problem with suspension at all, some top of the line Grace models (Level II and F-14) are amazing and all of them have exotic Boron cantilevers and much better styli (Micro Ridge), there are more great cartridges from that era too.
What the OP should learn is English language. Many english speaking persons pointed him to the "ignorant" word, but this idi*t continue to use it and addressed it to many audiogon members preneding to be a Oracle of High-End, but in fact he's an egoistic and very rude person. Once he has crossed the red line in communication on puplic forum, no respect anymore!
At the same time he is a person who left unpaid bill for many thousands euros from his ex re-tipper in Germany. It’s been said here on audiogon by another member who knew that re-tipper (now retired) in person. Would you trust this person ? No way.
Instead everyone if free to find the best cartridges to judge them individually. But destroying some unique original cartridges, refurbishing them with different parts is the last thing to do for any serious collectors/audiophiles. For a fans of VdH there are VdH cartridges available new or used.
Dear @downunder: """ personally, I don’t believe the hype or your new cartridge of the month.... """
Certainly it’s not the a hype and certainly it’s not " cartridge of the month " and that’s why I started a specific thread for it.
In the other side was to what you call " the cartridge of the month " in the MM thread where all of us discovered several MM/MI/IM cartridges that because its performance quality levels till today some of us are considered as a good alternative to the well regarded LOMC cartridges. No it can’t competes yet to the top today LOMC cartridges but the ADC 26/27.
In all that MM thread " voyage " we found out excellent, very good, good, average and mediocre performers and we learned about but with out that MM thread you never could have the opportunity to listen the Technics EPC100CMK4 ( stand alone model ) or the AT 25/24.
OF all those discovered cartridges the AKG and Technics were almost the only ones with some kind of problems and I remember very well that we found out a source for your stand alone Technics model, this source had 8 NOS units and you and me were some of the ones that bougth it. After that source never comes out another NOS of that stand alone Technics model.
I had your same problem with my sample before you and VDH was the only that fix it. Maybe because for many years that model was the cartridge reference of Dr. vDh whom manufactured MM cartridges too, I own two models that I not listened yet.
Your posts about in the MM thread were way different on what you posted in this thread:
Those were your words. Btw, I own the stand alone version of the AT25: AT24, really good performer.
""" How long would the suspension, dampers and every other part of the cartridge last if you used it as your everyday spinner - rather than the cartridge of the month for a few hours? """
in the same way that with the Technics but looking through the internet and by what Lutz shared here no one owner of the ADC 26/27/25 reported problems with the cartridge suspension, me neither.
Even I posted here that due that I own two cartridge bodies maybe I will send one cartridge for a change of cantilever/stylus tip and if need it dampers and fine tunned suspension.
I’m sure that will be an improvement for the better because the important subject in the quality performance level on any cartridge is the: self cartridge motor and in the case of the ADC 26/27 I can get better " materials " down there with out touch its motor: boron instead the aluminum cantilever and VDH stylus tip insted an old elliptical stylus shape and ceratinly better dampers and the like.
No, the original hollow Technics cantilever is an inferior design that a solid rod of today boron cantilevers, the hollow one is more resonant and suceptible to develops vibrations that does not exist in the LP grooves and today quality of stylus shapes are way better than the vintage ones. The motor is the real and true subject. Got It?
""" The VDH stylus is good but certainly does not sound as good as the original. ""
Not true, it sounds different but in anyway the original is superior. That you like it the original ( you hve very good udio memory but very bd memory on wht you sid in the pst ? ? ? ) does not means is better. Shane, makes no sense what you are saying.
BTW, Of all the Technics models I owned/own including the top LOMC one only the EPC00C MK4 gave me trouble.
The ADC 25/26/27 is the only non LOMC cartridge that can challenges today top LOMC included your Atlas that was challenged by the Technics that’s outperformed by the ADC.
Shane, do it a favor and don’t follow ignorant people because you will or are contaminated by.
Dear friends: I forgot something interesting I learned in the session listening with my friends.
One of them look the M&K D2D Earl " Fatha " Hines recording and we listened but when I was reading the LP cover I learned that Earl Hines together with Louis Amstrong recorded their first D2D LP in 1928 and by coincidence the E.Hines by M&K was recorded 50 years latter.
Hines was a great piano player and the M&K LP is really good and shows the E.Hines skillful about.
Btw, latter on I will post to that so high ignorance or bad memory levels already posted here. Always is a day to learn, unfortunatelly some people never learn or only want to attack some one .
@chakster I am well aware of the technics EPC 1000mk4 problems. I own one. Its an amazing cartridge while it lasted. VDH did some naughty crap without telling me when they put a new stylus onto the cantilever a few years back after it literally fell off.
The VDH stylus is good but certainly does not sound as good as the original.
personally, these days I stick with my Lyra Atlas SL - it really is king of every mountain for me.
@downunder in fact Technics cartridges are notorius for suspension problems, but people pays grazy prices for those models promoted by Raul, easily $2k or near. He has never explained in this thread how those problems were fixed by Van Den Hul and how much he paid for it (VgH service is extremely expensive). Nandrdic posted that it’s impossible to repair Technics suspension, unfortunately. I’ve had completely refurbished 205c mk4 models, but the whole stylus/cantilever and its housing were replaced (by Axel), so it’s no more the original. The genuine 205c mk4 was much better cartridge, but with failed suspension as 99% of them in this world. Prices for this model is getting up every year, but the buyers are getting a cart (which is impossible to fix) for nearly 2 grands with failed suspension (crazy). At the same time there are many more vintage MM cartridges much better than Technics and those carts designed with better materials, the suspension on my vintage cartridges never fail (except for the Technics). I’ve never seen a Technics 205 series with proper suspension, all of them are bad for this reason and i’ve had many different samples. Same rubber ring has been used on the most expensive 100c mk4 which goes for even higher price than 205c mk4... I don’t know how you guys can use this cartridge (if they are not refurbished). But when they are refurbished by VdH i believe this is no longer an original Technics. People who serviced them with VdH should spread the light how it was possible to "refresh" the suspension without replacing the cantilever and its housing? I have no idea about it, wish to know!
It the beginning of this thread he has raved about that Technics, claimed that’s the best ever MM, but now he clearly stated it was surpassed by some other cartridges. The hype is over.
From the start i realized this is the most problematic cartridge ever! And once i’ve scored the minty original, i soon realized, i have a better cartridges, also japanese vintage MM, but they don’t need expensive service at all. Manufacturer were smarter and suspension never fail even after 30 years.
Raul. You are a funny man. as if anyone is going to take risk on a 50 year old cartridge and pay big bucks for it.
How long would the suspension, dampers and every other part of the cartridge last if you used it as your everyday spinner - rather than the cartridge of the month for a few hours?
Dear friends: Last week came to my place the owners of the Etna Sl and Goldfinger cartridges to pick-up their cartridge and to have a listening session.
We started listening to those both cartridges and after a while I switched to the ADC 26/27 with out telling them which cartridge we will listening it.
We used the same LP tracks that already heard it and after a few minutes to listening the ADC and with out say a word both turn their face to each one with their " open eyes " expresion. They like it what was hearing. We followed with those LP tracks and when I told them what we were listening those " eyes " gave a non-credibility expresion. They were really impressed as me.
One of the LP in that listening session was the the D2D M&K Flamenco Fever and we listened to two tracks in the side one. First was Danza Mora and the second is Farruca. The recording session took place at " El Matador " club in west LA and that first track is a solo of an extraordinary guitarrist that in this D2D is so lively that you can’t believe what you are hearing. The second track will have a meaning only for those gentlemans that already experienced flamenco dancers in the " tablao ". The track start with those dancers playing castanets and if you already heard live at near field those castanets: its impact, transient and it power dynamics that’s exactly what you will find in this track played by the ADC but the more impressive starts when the dancers starts to dance and stamp/tap their heels and only if you already experienced live those flamenco dancers could understand the very high level of lively track experiences because they use to their hand and those hands applause and finger clips are astonishing.
We have to interrupt the session because started a heavy rain with thunders and hail. Here in México it’s raining time and rain almost every single day in México city.
After the storm we continue the listening session that gaves us the opportunity ( because I remembered. ) to listen two tracks of the MoFi ( 004. ) The Power and the Majesty Lp that as you know is not a music recording and by coincidence in one side was recorded a thunderstorm like the one we just experienced. This recording is exceptional one and was recorded with a custom made tape recorder live and I don’t know the microphone that were used.
Anyway, the track is a full lesson an room/system evaluation test. Our experience was and is so vivid that striking us the reality of the sounds when the hail strikes against the window glass exactly as we just experienced live a few minutes ago and followed by the rain water drops fall and striking to the surface was so real that there are no words to express it. What we heard was something like what @luckyx02 posted in this thread:
""" the midrange presence so good that you look scared when the turns / singers / in gets going if you are not alone in the room. """
Outstanding. The other side of that LP are the sounds coming for live steam locomotives through its railroad. All the track is impressive ( depending of the quality performance levels of your room/syste. ) and the locomotives came with air horns and steam whistles and when you listen the very first of the steam whistle sound you just give a " steps back " because at the same time the all train is passing in front of you. You need to listen this track at high SPL.
At the end of the session one of my friends ask me to listen again his cartridge and even that performs very well he was not satisfied against what he just listened with the ADC. This week I will be at his place with the ADC 26/27.
Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS, R.
@downunder tha’s the quality of the " month " cartridge. Obviously you don’t have idea about because never listened it,, the ADC is superior to your Technics. I'm still waiting your email.
Dear @downunder: I don’t believe your Thales hype neither, just joking.
Now if you are talking seriously and you are willing to pay according its quality level performance ( not as a vintage IM cartridge. Not even near the EPC100cMK4 price. ) that puts the cartridge at Etna or any other top LOMC I named here then email me here: rauliruegas@hotmail.com
I will say there is something to the naturalness and the way the music is presented on MM/MI cartridges. In many ways better then MC, especially when it come to the Timbre with Cymbals woodwinds and voices. WOW. The Pickering cartridge I am using is just incredible. I was so impressed that I bought an old Sonic Sonus Gold Blue Cartridge. Even if it is worn, I am still ahead with the Pickering. I would say it easily beats many cartridges. If it is in good condition, it will be a major win in my opinion. Overall for both Five hundred bucks it will sounds as good potentially as spending much more.
Hi Raul. personally, I don't believe the hype or your new cartridge of the month..
please send me the cartridge and I will use it on my Pioneer Exclusive P3 and Technics SP10mk3 with Thales arm. If it is as good as you say I will buy it.
Dear @bimasta @tzh21y : I started the MM/MI long thread now because in those times I discovered a true and real analog alternative to the very well regarded LOMC cartridges.
Was in the very old times when the cartridge market was dominated by all those vintage MM/MI cartridges and not by MC ones as today.
The competition in between all those MM/MI cartridge manufacturers was really a " world war " and that one fierce competition made it that each designer made it at their best knowledge levels. Almost " each day " came out a new cartridge to compete in that market.
That’s why exist so many vintage cartridges with so good quality level performance but today exist too very good MM/MI performers coming from: Reson, Audio Note UK, Grado, Ortofon, AT, Nagaoka, Sumiko etc.. I don’t name SoundSmith because it try to compete in price against MC today designs when the other today manufacturers of MM/MI cartridges comes with very reasonable market prices.
Again, MM/MI is a good alternative and at its price a real bargain. Good LOMC cartridges outperforms the MM/MI alternative but at really very high price for.
Something that does not honor the MM/MI cartridges is that almost exist no-dedicated/designed phono stages that achieve all MM/MI needs. Normally the phono stages are designed for LOMC ones and does not comes with a dedicated/separated MM true stages to fulfill all what the MM/MI are asking for.
Jepp, the XLM series ist the easiest way to listen to Pritchards work. I have luck to own his later on only "private" selled Typ IV of the XLM after the BSR judgement in 1986. I think Its the summary of his work.All other could have problems with channel inbalance out of the pole shoe miss-configuration. Sometimes a piece of paper on one side of the needle can rescue it.
I owned the 25 3-stylus set back in the mid-60's, and it was and is a great cartridge. BUT it absolutely requires a very low mass arm. Pritchard sold a light wooden gimbaled arm for it, which I used with a Thorens turntable until I mucked up the arm. Then switched to a Rabco ST-4 with linear tracking arm which was also extremely low mass. Eventually I ended up with an ADC XLM which I liked equally well and had a better stylus shape, I seem to recall. I sold the ADC 25 set years ago, but wish today I had it still. I still use the XLM today in my second system, with an OEM Shibata replacement stylus.
"ADC (K8) came today. When
I arrived home, I got it, of course, times roughly adjusted (Lenco
L55), MFSL Sergio Mendes and Brasil launched 66 and then: WOW! I did not think that it sounds so good. Extremely detailed and fine in resolution. The instruments detached from the speakers and stand firmly in the stage. Brutal deep bass, it sounds very fast and accurate, yet somehow calmly. I'm really what comes from the stool out. Everything sounds razor sharp! As an amplifier I have the Technics SU V 3, a TVV 46 and ProAcs Super tablets Yamaha subwoofer. Is really hard. I
like almost better as my Sanyo Q50 with ADC 25 at Sansui amp and
Celestion Ditton 22 This also shows that the best Sytem is useless if
the arm does not fit. The Technics Amp underlines this, if you can confirm Yorcks statements that this rauswirft only that whatever comes in. Simply brilliant, perfect!
Dear Lutz, Thank you !! I do not know what to say Perhaps only one thing: You've got it just depends !!! LG M."
I recently purchased a Sonus Gold Blue MM Cartridge after listeningto an Pickering ESV3000 and a Grace F9E and hearing the virtues of MM designs for the past. I really like the presentation they produce. I am getting addicted.
Dear @luckyx02: Well as you can read in the thread I compare the ADC 26/27 against today top LOMC cartridges as the Lyra Etna SL, Clearaudio Goldfinger, My Sonic Labs, etc etc and overall no one of them really outperformed. Yes, there are specific cartridge performance qualities on those models that we can like more than in the others but overall all performs great and the ADC 26/27 along all them.
I'm using VTF of 1.1gr. but now that the cartridge settle down I will set up with lower VTF. I own the 25 and 26 with four styluses: one black red dot, the white 26 and two beige 27s.
Btw, I own the QLM that I never ñistened so in the future I will do it. Rigth now I'm satisfied with the quality performance levels by the 26/27 as never before and I mean it.
Hi Raul,nothing has changed from that days. My ADC26 (ADC25 still in his original box) is mounted actually on the BSR 800 with the concrete damping and his Linn basik LV-V arm. Tracking force is 0,7p as recommened and its playing flawless anything including the canons of the Telarc 1812 LP. If you like ithe sound, you should check the ADC-K8 (OEM model) or the adequate QLM30. The sound beats a Koetsu, but it needs mass and high tracking force 3-4p. The sound wins with every fraction of a gram. Make the selftest and start with 2,5p. There is no cheaper way to vinyl heaven....
The last times I collect the headshell integrated systems "Integra" in all versions. Matching my American Audio HTD 4.5. Universal in any direction: mass and VTA adjustable.
...nothing new for me and my visitors. I wrote this around ten years ago on my website in "Die Liste" :
ADC 25,26,27= - *)> With the second generation of the ADC 10E, Peter Pritchard has already created in the 60’s the perfect system. The space reproduction combines the accuracy of a holographic Grace F9, with the depth of a dimension 5. The bass is deep rumbling and extremely precise. The high frequency resolution very fine and nuanced, the midrange presence so good that you look scared when the turns / singers / in gets going if you are not alone in the room. The ADC 25 is a complete set with 3 different needle cuts. only the sharp elliptical version 27, are identical at 26, the stand-alone of 25, and the slightly harder needle of the rated here. Light arms are required. OK, just with CU50 to the AR arms of dual, for the 27er is ideal with CU40. Attention 15 ° system, the VTA and the AK is extremely critical in this State of The Art System. *) It therefore runs in this list out of competition without scoring.
https://luckyx02.de/die-liste/ Dont forget to switch the language to english on the top left. Its possibly the largest info site about Pritchard and his carts in the www. CheersLutz
Dear @cleeds@harold-not-the-barrel : As a fact I read the comments somewhere with out taking in count the date of those comments, but that's not the real issue. Thank's for both of you posts.
The main issue is that we don't need necessarily a low mass tonearm to enjoy the 26/27/25 cartridges.
The people in the 60's made comments that only the Infinity blackwidow
or the Pritchard tonearm design were almost the ony tonearms to make the
job but we learn that's not that way.
Raul, I think you are a bit confused. Infinity didn't even exist in the '60s, and the Black Widow arm wasn't made until the late '70s.
Dear @tzh21y@lewm : Not necessarily a low mass tonearm as lewm posted:
"
success illustrates the fact that one need not necessarily be obsessed with that equation for resonant frequency "
Everything the same: is it important to match the cartridge/tonearm to the " ideal " resonance frequency range?
As always in audio: yes in theory it's important but not at the level we could think or the level we learned somewhere.
The important issue is that the tonearm be a well damped design.
In the old times B.Pisha ( Audio magazyne. ) reviewed the LOMC cartridge Ortofon MC2000 and he found out in his real time review measurements that the compliance of that cartridge was at around 32cu and with a weigth of 10+grsm. He mounted during the review with a Technics tonearm and the measured resonance frequency was at around 5hz ! and he reported that that cartridge/tonearm combination were abble to play with out any tracking trouble all those cannon shots in the Telarc 1812 !.
Those facts goes against the thery about but I confirmed and confirm those kind of results sveral times with other tonearm/cartridge combinations.
The main reason why the MC2000/Technics tonearm did not shows any trouble was the great damping mechanism in the tonearm and obviously the huge tracking abilities of that Ortofon cartridge.
So, the best is to try and listen.
The people in the 60's made comments that only the Infinity blackwidow or the Pritchard tonearm design were almost the ony tonearms to make the job but we learn that's not that way.
Dear @downunder : Yes that XLM III is an average performer as you stated but even that the cartridge is an IM patent Pritchard design he was not involved any more with ADC because in 1976 that was when came the XLM III was BSR the ADC owner not Pritchard.
Anyway, both cartridges has no quality performance alike in between. Totally different.
Has anyone tried Denon DA-401 tonearm for high compliance MM cartridges? The headshell is removabale, but unique type, so it's impossible to use any other headshells, except for the Denon shell designed for this tonearm. But the arm must be great for a High Compliance carts like those ADC, Sonus, Grace, Stanton ...
Bimasta, I don’t think we want to talk politics here. Nor are we allowed to by the rules, I think. That is why I apologized for my post. I think there is a whole separate forum for arguing about the state of the world. I am too frustrated and convinced of my own powerlessness to bother. Meantime, I still have not found an ADC26 or 27 for sale.
TZ, earlier on I asked Raul to specify what tone arms he was using with his ADC 26. He responded by saying he is using either one of two tone arms that he characterizes as medium mass. I assume this means the effective mass is at least 10 or 11 g. But you are correct in your inference that cartridges with such high compliance as that of the ADC 26, in theory should be used with very low mass tonearms. In fact, so far as I know, there were only one or two tone arms ever made that would be perfectly matched to the ADC 26, so high is its compliance. But Raul’s success illustrates the fact that one need not necessarily be obsessed with that equation for resonant frequency.
I answered Lewm’s post — "Surely, that is the most important issue of our day, not the collapse of democracy and liberalism in Europe and the US" — immediately with: "It is because of that collapse that we’re focusing on trivia" — and it posted.
Now it’s gone. Was it removed? Don’t they usually leave a little note saying "post removed"?
Yet Lewm’s original statement remains; why wasn’t it removed? Maybe because it mentioned cartridges, in passing? And why must Lewm apologize?
Are serious things forbidden on AG? Why is "the world situation rated X", as Chakster ’explains’? I can understand disputes of a political nature being discouraged, they can become vitriolic and ad hominem (of course that never happens when discussing audio) — but there’s no dispute here.
I am focusing my attention on the eternal debate between chakster and nAndric over the true origins of the glanZ MFG 61 phono cartridge. Surely, that is the most important issue of our day, not the collapse of democracy and liberalism in Europe and the US.
The world situation is rated X, it’s been said back in the 70’s and this is my favorite song for today’s situation. The song was unreleased for 40 years untill now, sounds like it was written yesterday. Pure soul music with the message.
Der @rodman99999 : ""
kept it(or something equivalent) in production. """
well I think that the equivalent is already in production with all those top LOMC cartridges as the ones I named here. Yes at a price point for that kind of high quality performance levels.
I wonder how will performs the ADC 26/27/25 with a boron cantilever and/or Shibata stylus?..
Due that I own more than one original I will try something like that but I'm not to sure about because in stock condition are very good performers, I will think again about in the future. For now I'm too busy listening MUSIC.
One would think, if a product was, "the best of" anything, according to enough opinions, someone would have noticed and kept it(or something equivalent) in production.
Since I doubt that I will ever find and buy an ADC 26 or 27 cartridge, I am focusing my attention on the eternal debate between chakster and nAndric over the true origins of the glanZ MFG 61 phono cartridge. Surely, that is the most important issue of our day, not the collapse of democracy and liberalism in Europe and the US.
Dear friends: Yesterday an audio friend that's owner of the ZYX Universe came to my place with his cartridge and we were listening for a few hours and we made comparisons against the ADC 26/27.
All my audio friends know very well the quality performance level of my room/audio system because they were here many times. Well this ZYX owner was really surprised on what he listening from the ADC and after aa while he confessed that he prefers the ADC.
I have to say that along the A95 the Universe are the ones where quality levels differences are a little higher for the better in the ADC 26/27.
.I still follow and will follow listening it and making some cartridge fine tunning. I think that that ADC 26/27 cartridge suspension conitune settle down, we have to remember that was manufactured over 50+ years ago. It's performance continue improving a little through that fine tunning. As a fact I'm trying to " know " the cartridge overall performance its " behavior ".
@nandric No, there is no Astatic logo on my Glanz and no "A with a legs" anywhere on the cartridge. There is a "HAH" letters on the inner side of the stylus replacement. The Glanz Logo is on the front side of the cartridge and also on the stylus protector mounted to the cartridge body. The cartridge generator is silver and the stylus replacement is purple on 61 model.
I think Glanz people ordered some special cartridge from Mitachi and they got 61 as the best model, while the Astatic never ordered anything like that. Two different companies in different countries, one OEM in Japan. Astatic is Canadian brand?
Mr. Masataka Hamada who was the developer of “GLANZ” at Mitachi Acoustics, has resurrected “GLANZ” within his own company, Hamada Electric. http://glanz.tech/e/profile/
Glanz now making tonearms: http://glanz.tech/ New address and contact info: GLANZ 788-5 O-oka Numazu City Shizuoka, 410-0022, JAPAN TEL +81 55-963-8712 FAX +81 55-963-8758
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.
