Accuracy vs. musicality


I imagine if you have an unlimited budget you can have both ultimate accuracy and musicality.
For those of us whose budget is somewhat limited, we usually have to make a choice.
I very recently obtained  speakers (which I prefer not to name so as to avoid debate.  Some of you do know them.) These speakers were criticized by an Agoner for not being accurate.
Now, I heard the speakers he liked better and they we’re fine, and maybe more “etched,” but they did not convey the musical message as well to me.  Indeed I compared many such speakers recommended by members (there was little love for mine) and I found them not to have the sound I hear in a concert hall. They did not communicate to me as well.
So, what’s more important: precise accuracy or musicality?
rvpiano

Showing 4 responses by rvpiano

Yes, my use of the term accurate should have had parentheses: “accurate.”
What you say, Charles: “dry, analytical, clinical sound,” is often mistaken for accurate.  Similarly, muddy coloration is often confused with musical.
Actual accuracy IS musical.
  However, the fly in the ointment, as others have said, is one person’s reality may not be another’s.
Twoleftears,

Point well taken.  If you close your eyes, you can imagine “being there” with a more distant perspective.  This applies to the engineering of the recording  as well.
However, some labels have such a distant image, it’s hard for me to believe I’m there (e.g. Reference Recordings.)
One more thought on this topic.
 You’re never going to get a full symphony orchestra in your listening room, no matter how accurate or expensive your system is.
 The illusion of an orchestra is all you’ll get.  At times this approximation is not achieved by the most “accurate” components. I’ve sometimes  gotten the illusion better with lower quality gear.  It’s not an exact science.