If you’re really looking to upgrade you’re looking at a separate amp, preamp, phono pre, DAC, and streamer with all the interconnects involved therein, which aren’t cheap either. If you’re not ready or willing to go that route, just stick with what’s convenient in one box. There are some better alternatives from Hegel, etc. that’ll get you more performance in one box, but when you get serious about this you want separate components. Period.
Accuphase vs. McIntosh MCA 7200
I currently have an NAD M-33 and love all the features and convenience of having everything in one, powerful package (and the Dirac is extremely helpful in my large room). But I sure I’m missing a greater musical experience with this amp. I’ve had friends tell me to buy an Accuphase E-4000. But it doesn’t even come with a means to use my phonograph! That part costs another $1,300 and then I’d have to buy a steamer for Tidal and Bluetooth which is another $500-1500.
Another friend said I should look at the Mac MCA 7200 which while not having a streamer, at least allows you to plug in your phonograph! This is an expensive amp too.
My question:
1. Is the extra musical experience worth the $11K upgrade from the NAD?
2. If it is worth the money, which amp should I purchase?
Thanks in advance for your help