Accuphase vs. McIntosh MCA 7200


I currently have an NAD M-33 and love all the features and convenience of having everything in one, powerful package (and the Dirac is extremely helpful in my large room). But I sure I’m missing a greater musical experience with this amp. I’ve had friends tell me to buy an Accuphase E-4000. But it doesn’t even come with a means to use my phonograph! That part costs another $1,300 and then I’d have to buy a steamer for Tidal and Bluetooth which is another $500-1500.  
 

Another friend said I should look at the Mac MCA 7200 which while not having a streamer, at least allows you to plug in your phonograph! This is an expensive amp too. 
 

My question:

1.  Is the extra musical experience worth the $11K upgrade from the NAD? 
2.  If it is worth the money, which amp should I purchase?

Thanks in advance for your help  

 

aldermine

Showing 1 response by oddiofyl

The MAC 7200 is very good, it's only available as  a Receiver in North America.  Elsewhere it is the MA7200 integrated.  

My Dad owns the MA8950 and it is quite good.  Great sounding and plenty of power for most .....