A principle guiding the wise audiophile life


There is one law, or best said a principle, guiding the wise audiophile life :
 
What matter is not the gear pieces price or his design, it is up to our budget limit to pick the right stuff for ourselves and our needs.
 
What matter is the way we installed together the mechanical,electrical and acoustical working dimensions of any chosen system/room...
 
As a consequence of this principle this is his corollary:
 
The mechanical electrical and acoustical controls,devices,tweaks, parameters, cannot be replaced by one another  if we want to reach an optimal result in sound quality.
 
Vibrations/resonance controls cannot replace or be replaced by acoustics parameters controls or EMI shielding and grounding for example.
 
The greatest error we can do is buying and  just "plug and play". Then upgrading a piece part by frustration or dissatisfaction, without learning how the whole system may,must,can behave in a  specific room for our specific ears (psycho-acoustics).
 
The other error will be to cure one problem with a gear upgrade before trying to understand what is the problem. 
 
 
This must be meditated by  any beginners before "upgrading" and after "upgrading"...
 
 There is no relation between a piece of gear or a system/room before and after his optimal mechanical,electrical and acoustical installation. None.
 
It is the reason why reviews do not tell all the truth there is to be tell ...
 
This resume what i have learned. 
 
What have you learned yourself ?
mahgister

Interesting story!

Bare minimum audiophilia for survivalist in hard reality...

It remind me of my actual bliss under the blanket at 13 years old with the first small transistor radio... Music quiet my fears...

 

I like your last paragraph especially : 

Then I made a college friend who opened the door for me. This guy had a fairly advanced reel-to-reel sound system. He said "Here, smoke this," and then he told me to lie down and put some Koss headphones on me and fired up Cat Stevens' "Tea For the Tillerman" album.

"Ok," I said to myself after floating back down to Earth. "Now I see."

 

My understanding of the OP's comments is that no matter what you have, you should optimize it. You optimize it individually and you optimize it in relation to everything else in the environment. I believe you should always start with the room because you don't want a speaker that is too big or too small for the room. Once you decide on the speaker, you then need to place it appropriately relative to listening position and you should consider isolating it mechanically. There should be some acoustic treatment and the signal you feed to it should be as pure as possible. You should go through every component in your room and see whether or not you've optimally matched it to other components and that you have optimized it mechanically, electrically, and acoustically. 

It takes about 6 months for speakers to get broken in to sound their best. The room you place your system in is as important as the components you have picked for your system. 

What matters most, is you like the sound of your system.

5 years  ago I purchased an integrated Primaluna, built my own speakers and love the sound of my system. Could it be better? Of course, if I want to nit pick. Perfection is an opinion, not a reality in Audio reproduction. There is a fine line between, "how much better per $1000 will be worth the cost."  For those with deep pockets, well go for it. For me, listening before I purchased maximized the dollars I spent. I had about 100hrs in my speakers before I said, this is what I want. Perfect? For my dollars spent, for me it's darn close. 

@tcutter

​​​​Nice summary. I think you’ve pretty well nailed it in one elegant paragraph.

Personally, the only thing I’d change would be to emphasise the importance of the source more. Although arguably you’ve got that covered by saying the signal should be as pure as possible.

i concur... +1

Nice summary. I think you’ve pretty well nailed it in one elegant paragraph.