A move from Harbeth to... Wilson?


Hi gang, hoping for some thoughts. 

I'm very happy at the moment with my system, but getting a slight itch for an upgrade. So many options and directions I could go, but the one I'm pondering at the moment is moving from my Harbeth C7ES-3 speakers to Wilson Sabrinas. (The Sabrina X is now out, which may bring the Sabrina down to my budget... maybe.)

My room is approx. 10'6" x 15'6" with the speakers along the short wall and my listening chair is about 2/3 back from said wall. The C7s plus their stands are just about the right size for this room, and the Sabrinas on their floor spikes are similar in "overall" size, though obviously the speakers themselves are bigger.

Current amp is a Pass Labs XA30.5 which doubles down at 4Ohms (plus lots of headroom) and comes just within Wilson's "recommended" amplifier power. The room is on the smaller side, and I don't listen loud; I've never "wanted" for more power with the C7s. (Though every once in a while I wonder what a pair of XA60.5s would sound like in here, but that's an entirely different thread.)

Eh? Any thoughts?
128x128Ag insider logo xs@2xdon_chisholm

completely different kettle of fish is right

although i will say that modern wilsons are smoother and easier to mate with ancillaries than older ones with the metal tweeters... those could exhibit much stridency and hardness/harshness with minimal provovation

Old thread. If anyone prefers the sound of the Harbeth and desires to have a slightly more transparent, open and detailed sound, the Graham is a good choice. Basically a sound with slightly improved clarity and detail which can make a significant difference to the listening experience. My comment is based on the comparison between the equivalent Graham models to the older Harbeth pre XD models such as P3ESR, C7ES3, M30.1 / 30.2, SHL5+ and M40.1 or 40.2.

I've listened to the Wilson Sasha mk1 about 11 years ago. Sound is rather good.

 

Just saw this very interesting thread. I know it’s old but may still be relevant to others. There seem to be a lot of "Wilson haters" on here so I thought I would chip in as I think my experience is relevant. I owned "BBC monitor" style speakers for decades from the likes of Rogers, Spendor, KEF, B&W, et al. They are all wonderful with what my grandmother would have called a "nice tone". However, some years back I had the opportunity to audition Wilson Sabrinas. And I was sold. Wilson does not have a "nice tone" as such. They just sound, to my ears, like attending the live event! I know it’s personal. But even given the ridiculous expense, I have subsequently upgraded to the Sasha DAW and now have a pair of Alexia V on order. Harbeth and Wilson are chalk and cheese. Both are excellent at what they do. Both have a distinguished heritage. But ultimately it’s down to personal preference and budget. Would love to learn what the OP did?

all excellent, well established, successful speakers are doing something very right

it just depends if their flavor of ’right’ matches your tastes and requirements

furthermore, ’live’ music comes in vastly different flavors too. .. mid hall at boston symphony vs grandstand at coldplay concert vs third row at village vanguard jazz show... substantially different sounding ’live performances’

Post removed