should have painted = should NOT have painted
oh well
That would make for an interesti9ng visual, @grislybutter . But seriously, on my budget, if I could buy a speaker that out performed it's price tag and save a significant amount of money because the manufacturer had put everything into performance and nothing into aesthetics, I'd be all about that. But I do understand how everyone doesn't (literally) see it that way. After I read the Volti Razz posts and went to their site, I love the idea of being able to buy a great performing speaker and saving 2k by selecting the option of NOT having it painted or finished. |
It’s really not that hard to make a speaker look a li’l better. In this case, he could have just moved the ports to the back or resorted to some slot design or whatever (two gaping holes in the front which look like that orifice takes away aesthetic appeal). Let’s see....not sure why he wouldn’t do a vertically stacked MTM with just 2 mids....and a swept back facet on that fat front baffle (it would also take care of diffraction errors). Such things could also increase performance and aesthetic appeal. Maybe, it’ll happen in a version 2.0 eh?
|
@deep_333 I don't know how easy it is to design a speaker to look better by moving things around. I assume those drivers are there for a reason? You do realize it's a small shop with an incredible selection of amps - for its size.
|