Pabelson,
Thanks for the response. According to NAD, the DACs, filters, etc. in the C542 are better than in the receiver--plus, I've had experience with how good the C542 can sound in a dedicated 2-ch system. As for NAD's response, the only reason I'm questioning it is because the tech support guy didn't really know the answers to the questions himself and had to keep going back and forth between me and the engineers "in back." Maybe it's just my natural suspicion of all things!
How common is a true analog stereo bypass with bass management in receivers? I'd always thought that receivers and pre-pros tended to sneak the process back into the DSP domain without telling you.
Thanks for the response. According to NAD, the DACs, filters, etc. in the C542 are better than in the receiver--plus, I've had experience with how good the C542 can sound in a dedicated 2-ch system. As for NAD's response, the only reason I'm questioning it is because the tech support guy didn't really know the answers to the questions himself and had to keep going back and forth between me and the engineers "in back." Maybe it's just my natural suspicion of all things!
How common is a true analog stereo bypass with bass management in receivers? I'd always thought that receivers and pre-pros tended to sneak the process back into the DSP domain without telling you.