6H30 tubes vs the others


I’m scouting the used listings and reading up on tube preamps. I see many of the older ‘heavy hitter’ brands like the 6H30 in their units, BAT using them in their upgraded pre’s even now, yet most threads/posts I read are down on that tube type. The flavor du joir seems to be the 6SN7, except in the mega-buck units. Probably a generalization, but it seems to be a theme I’m seeing. I’m considering an older ‘higher end’ unit as a way to try something, anything to see if I like tubes, and not loose too much if I don’t. I’m not technical enough to understand more than the most rudimentary explanations, but hopefully I can keep learning from those who have gone before...
english210

Showing 2 responses by atmasphere

Microphonics is the vibration of the tube’s glass, which introduces itself into the signal?
is that the purpose of the damper rings I see around some tubes? You’re saying it’s more of an issue on 6H30’s more than other tubes?
Microphonics has more to do with how the internal structure deals with vibration. It does come through the glass, but damping the glass does little if the tube is microphonic.

If you’ve been buying tubes from a manufacturer like ARC, the tubes are already hand-picked for low microphonics, which relates directly to their cost. I’m seeing this from a production point of view; when we buy 100 tubes at a time, its nice if you can use most of them. Some tubes (like the 6H30) simply have a higher rejection rate on account of microphonics.
The basic design of the 6H30 is ideal for audio.  
The main issue with tubes like this (frame grid triodes; includes the 6DJ8) is microphonics, as they were not intended for audio. Linearity is good though.