thyname
Responses from thyname
| Audio Science Review = Rebuttal and Further Thoughts So $2 DAC transparent enough? Or do one have to spend a lot more, like $50 Toppings DAC? Some eye popping proof here: https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/how-good-are-2-dacs | |
| Audio Science Review = Rebuttal and Further Thoughts @fleschler : arguing about DACs with ASR crowd is a waste of time. Quit it while you are ahead. I was once told a DAC is not even part of the audio chain. Just part of the electric delivery. Just like a power cord, or any cable for that matter, wh... | |
| 432 EVO @jerryg123 Yes indeed. We have to pick “our battles”, cannot fight in all fronts. I have a Zennith too, and that part of my audio chain is now complete, of course until it breaks down. Or I change my mind. Whichever comes first 😂. But for now, I a... | |
| 432 EVO I think you are confusing me with someone else @tomcy6 , I have not had the chance to try any EVO 432, neither do I intend to do so anytime soon. Sorry | |
| USB cables conducor - help jpmanomet 36 posts 10-22-2022 at 06:29am Don’t pay attention to those whose only answer is to buy a streamer. Using a PC with an audio only purposed operating system works good, very good. A quality cable from a reputable brand is adequate a... | |
| USB cables conducor - help Step #1: ditch using a general purpose computer as a streamer Step #2: experiment with USB cables. Slowly | |
| Audio Science Review = Rebuttal and Further Thoughts And hence the measurements tell us how closely a playback of say a piano sounds like, say… a real piano. We do not care whether person B hears a piano sounding like flute, we only care that it is replicated correctly. if you need measurement... | |
| Audio Science Review = Rebuttal and Further Thoughts After all, you've been in these threads making arguments. You could have just skipped them, but you didn't. Why? That's true. And honestly, I shouldn't. prof 3,131 posts 10-20-2022 at 05:18pm Or, you can just ignore those posts. One ... | |
| Audio Science Review = Rebuttal and Further Thoughts I am all for middle ground. It’s just some don’t like that, my way or the highway sort of thing. Not me. And: NO audiophile needs to justify his purchase or engage in measurements or controlled testing. To each his own. Yup! Exactly. But: B... | |
| Audio Science Review = Rebuttal and Further Thoughts Well @prof I am sorry. You are wrong 😆. You have said it yourself: if you share any listening experience that is not backed by either measurements or double blind ABX tests certified by a panel of independent third party individuals (preferably bo... | |
| Audio Science Review = Rebuttal and Further Thoughts prof 3,127 posts 10-20-2022 at 03:34pm What timing. Sure enough, after writing the above, I'm going through just this same debate on ASR once again, where someone there has declared subjective impressions as meaningless and useless. B... | |
| Parity @bdp24 : Well said. Spot on! But…. It is what it is. @rvpiano : I am not surprised with your findings. From my (failed) experience with vinyl a few years back, I realized pretty quick I had to spend a lot more money on my vinyl gig to match the p... | |
| Audio Science Review = Rebuttal and Further Thoughts Dude. It’s not a claim. It’s sharing own experiences. What part of “sharing experience “ don’t you understand. Claim? You guys crack me up. And “counter claim”? 😂🤦♂️🙄 And why do you try to mask where you stand on the Great Debate. Can’t you j... | |
| Audio Science Review = Rebuttal and Further Thoughts @hotei : Does audio replay equipment sound good or not. You are not supposed to post anything on how something sounds unless you have proof to back it up. If no proof, they you are in a nutshell making baseless claims 🤦♂️ | |
| Audio Science Review = Rebuttal and Further Thoughts @prof : I completely miss the point of your dissertation. But I am not a professor. My reply I thought was pretty simple. You say: I’m much more persuaded by evidence, than mere claims. May I ask: how do you find your evidence? What “persu... |