Posts by rauliruegas | Audiogon Discussion Forum

rauliruegas

Responses from rauliruegas

Dec 27, 2015	interesting phenomena in the cutting room Dear friends: Like you I'm a guest in this Atmasphere thread. Because he decided to stay " dead silence " against my posts where I ask for a wide explanation I have to ask to a today expert recording engineer trying to learn and understand not onl...
Dec 27, 2015	Tonearms longer than 12 inches Dear noslepums: Audio world is full of many non-sense " things ". Tonearms is no exception.12"-14"-16" or whatever pivot tonearm is, IMHO, a terrible mistake supported by the tonearm designers/manufacturers and an additional marketing " hype " a...
Dec 23, 2015	Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear friends: On the JVC X-1/Z-1/SAS topic and when all of you have very diferent quality performances experiences than me I always re-think what's happening with what I heard and in the last days I was busy listening both JVC cartridges through m...
Dec 23, 2015	interesting phenomena in the cutting room Dear Atmasphere: You was whom started the thread and as I posted I'm just one more ignorant ( down there ) about the overall recording process and that's why I ask to the expert that in this case is you but you don't gave any explanation about and...
Dec 23, 2015	Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Lewm: The Collector's Series 100 was one model that in theory was the top of the line in the Stanton catalogue ( over the 981. ).Nowe, we can't compare the HZ with the LZ because are different cartridges that IMHO both outperforms the 100. If...
Dec 22, 2015	Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Lewm: In that Astatic series the top of the line is the MF 100 that's IMHO is very good neutral performer where rhe MF 200 is very good too with more " drama ". You can't go wrong with any of those two Astatic's.In the other side, I owned th...
Dec 19, 2015	Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear chakster: Exist many audio subjects where we learned or understood in not the right way.It's almost imposible to have even " twins " as you named on cartridges not even with cartridges coming from the same manufacturer.Audio Technica, Stanton...
Dec 17, 2015	interesting phenomena in the cutting room Dear Atmasphere: " Of the things listed most have nothing to do with the LP except the mastering, plating and the resulting quality of the pressings. " WOW!, I'm totally an ignorant because my thought is ( ? ) that different icrophones have di...
Dec 16, 2015	interesting phenomena in the cutting room of course!: quality of the tape recorder and kind of tape they choosed.Regards and enjoy the music,R.
Dec 16, 2015	interesting phenomena in the cutting room Dear atmasphere: " The real limitation in LP recording is the playback apparatus, not the cutters. " That I remember in this forum I never read a post where some one saids that cutters were the problem with the LP recordings/playback.The normal ...
Dec 16, 2015	Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear chakster: So, you have no facts and only:" The Astatic is a very good cartridge but I do not feel that it is in the same domain as these Glanz ... " just feelings with no real/objective facts that can confirm that opinion.In the other sid...
Dec 15, 2015	Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? or I'm totally wrong. Could you put some light about?R.
Dec 15, 2015	Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear chakster: I think that you have to re-read what I posted to you again. Here it's:""" The " clone " you name it: MF 200/ mfg 31L is a good example that those cartridges are not clones.The output level on both cartridges is different 4.2mv v...
Dec 15, 2015	Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? """ ... ( like the Z1/SAS vs JVC X1-MK2 ) when both are way way different in all parameters ? """" even the cartridge body design/construction and stylus/cantilever holder are different!!!!!! same cartridge body resonances?????R.
Dec 15, 2015	Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear friens: How could be that two " different " cartridges with different specs and different people cartridge design voicing can sounds/performs the same ( as the MF 200 vs MFG 31L ) for many of you? or that could performs so nearest, for some ...