rauliruegas
Responses from rauliruegas
| What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'? " I used acoustics concepts applied full time for more than one year ... Why? Because before i experimented my "taste" was completely uninformed and i did not know how to be satisfied by sound in my room with my system. " "" i did not know ho... | |
| What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'? Dear @mahgister : " informed and uninformed biases. " I understand your point about and by my comon sense tells me that exist diffrent levels/gradation of informed/uninformed biases in all of us and in some ways some psycho-acoustics concepts... | |
| What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'? I don’t want to open a new window in this thread because it’s useless and even futile and only want to tell that today is STILL TRUE . Now could be of some interest for some of us to know for example why some one likes more the Firebird than t... | |
| What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'? Dear @fair : " yet there is still a remaining topic of the gear that musicians, recording engineers, mixing engineers, and mastering engineers use. " As an audiophile and MUSIC lover I almost do not care about but anyway all what happens down th... | |
| What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'? Dear @fair : " Also, preferred most often listened to music genres, and even specific artists. " as with your friend mentioned. Perhaps in those old days (n 1997 as Plinius. ) those kind of electronics behavior could happened but today electroni... | |
| What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'? First step must be electrical/mechanical matching. Acoustical matchimg is another and different issue that mainly depends ( everything the same ) of what we like it/taste.. R. | |
| What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'? @mahgister : " does not means that there is no acoustics concepts behind all these different choices. " I never said " there is no acoustics concepts behind " and as a fact I " said " the other way around when I posted that agree with @mapma... | |
| What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'? Btw, @mulveling when I talk of " component matching " I refer to elictrical/mechanical matched. R. | |
| What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'? sorry but my finger error. @mahgister : " I dont doubt that most audiophiles plays with room acoustic in a way or in another ... I am not alone ... But there is difference of level and control between putting panels on a wall and designin... | |
| What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'? +1 @mulveling . R. | |
| What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'? @mahgister : " I prefer acoustics investigation and experiments..." that statement seems to me as if you are the only audiophile that do that. You can be sure that almost all of the gentlemans in this thread and over the audio world thr... | |
| What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'? @snapsc : " Expensive " in audio means that " expensive " and nothing more and you like what you like, you like what is right for you. R. | |
| What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'? Dear @mahgister : I agree to disagree with you and I have to tell you that I have first hand experiences witrh the SS electronic design and when José and I was in the live design and choosing active/passive parts first step was reading the part m... | |
| What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'? Another example any one could try is to listen say a sax alto or a trumpet at 2-3 meters where the player is playing at live event SPL's, no one can tolerate it by more than maybe 5-10 minutes or maybe less but with a violin at 1m. it's the same. ... | |
| What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'? Dear @dman777 : I agree in almost al@mapman @hilde45 already posted but for different reasons. " Musical " is a wrong word used for years as an adjective for any audio item in a room/system and not only amps. Why " wrong "? first because ... |