nandric
Responses from nandric
| Turntable speed accuracy Dear Swampwalker, 'Our' Lew is a scientist so no wonder heuse what Wittgenstein called 'scientific grammar'. I would prefer 'indicative statements' above 'declarative' but in any case the 'truth valued ' statments are presupposed. I believe that t... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Tubed1, As I stated beforhand an amateur may have somegood idea but to ask the same amateur for any explanation is a totally different matter. Ie I have never tought about possible similarity between airplanes and speaker enclosures. So far I... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? The sub name is Torus and the name of the producer is Wilson Benesch. Regards, | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? While it is not probable it is also not impossible that anamateur can produce some good thought experiment. How about speakers and carbon fiber? I mean the enclosure, not the drivers. The enclosure is not supposed to resonat at all so if carbon fi... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Lew, You 'resonated' the right physical base. Wat 'we'only need to do is adjust all involved resonances to their'natural resonance(s) level'. Ie the exaggerated one by'killing' them and by jack up those that are below their natural level. But... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Professor, I am in no way responsible for any styluskind whatever nor for the Yugo car. But as a former Yugo-guy I feel very distressed with your comment about our 'national pride' with a heated rear glass. We really thought that the heated r... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Speaking about Dudley. I always thought that he is anold-fashioned Englishman interested in antique and listening with his eye. As a foreinger I may be interested in the 'English litarature' but only in translatation. So his literary capabilities ... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Lew, To my knowledge the Magic has nothing to do withDenon but (look at the pictures) probable with EMT or Ortofon SPU. Then, according to my information, this cart price in Switzerland is 'only' $ 2500. While I must confess to be intriqued I... | |
| Some tables have soul and some not Syntax has the inclination to express him self in a crypticway. The aim is to be informative as well as humoristic. Itranslate first his sentences in German , then from Germaninto Dutch and this way I am sometime able to 'grasp' his meaning.Regards, | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Raul, I am not suprised at all that you have heardthe Magic diamond already. It would be strange if you had missed any cart of some interest. I assume that you have read the thread in our forum by KCR about 'Magic Diamond vs Airtight PC 1'? T... | |
| Do you buy Insurance for Stereo Equipment? My life insurance is cheaper. There is of course no way that I can profit from this kind of insurance but it is also a question of principles. It feels as if my gear is more valuable then my life. Besides my gear already cost me a fortune.Regards, | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Lew&Griffithds, There is some similarity between 'our own'Dertonarm and Andreoli. I want mention 'provocative minds'but only two facts. The first is that there is no way to win any dispute from them. As German speakers they answer 'nein' to an... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Raul, This is very important info. In particular thathe is willing to repair COILS and suspension. I would never buy a cart with one channel 'death' even if it was a really 'beautuful cardinal'. This however is based on my assumption that nob... | |
| Some tables have soul and some not Because of Syntax I thought about Germans and then aboutHegel and his method of 'opposites'. For each concept there is the opposite one,then the opposites of the opposites etc. Say: objective-subjective; inside-outside; on one hand and the other,g... | |
| Who needs a MM cartridge type when we have MC? Dear Professor, Nearly everyone disputed Andreoli's 'conical conclusion' but nearly nobody discussed his complex and (very) extended premisses based on his research. I have read his both articles but by lack of technical knowledge I was not able t... |