mahgister
Responses from mahgister
I don't want to beat a dead horse but I'm bugged. Great post which express my own opinion too... I haven’t noticed any participant on this thread rejecting scientific data, who’s doing that? I would acknowledge that there are posters (including myself) who believe reliance on measurement is no... | |
I am so happy..... Thanks it is an interesting experience... I've had some first hand experience with how powerful room acoustics can be, verifying your approach to good sound. I got to listen to Revel Ultima Salon II, JBL 4367, some Golden Ear towers (don't know ... | |
objective vs. subjective rabbit hole We never listen to a SINGLE component... We listen to a chain of events on different scale... Then the set of measures which can make good design sound good exist yes, i never contested that, but nobody listen to an amplifier disconnected from a... | |
objective vs. subjective rabbit hole The measurement does not exist alone... It exist with all other actual, and others possible measurements... I never say that audiophile can rival any measuring apparatus in his precise realm of application... I only say that objective measures... | |
objective vs. subjective rabbit hole if someone doubt Goethe scientific value, read this: Dennis SEPPER, as the sober historian of science close reading Newton’s 1672 letter and Goethe’s Contributions to Optics, concluded: ‘I have come to believe that Goethe has an ampler conceptio... | |
Jazz for aficionados Welcome back Mrs. 😊 | |
objective vs. subjective rabbit hole ’objectivity’ does not really exist. the only thing that exists is a subjective reality experience. Your claim is not false for sure but is not right either... Why? because objectivity is not a "fact" and subjectivity is not a "fact" either, ... | |
objective vs. subjective rabbit hole "Flat" response is an engineering measured ideal for designing good pieces of gear... No piece of gear is perceived to be "flat" by specific ears in a specific normal room IN THE SAME EXACT WAY by all people... Because nobody hear the same way, ... | |
objective vs. subjective rabbit hole Think of it as tasting wine. One can measure acidity, sweetness, color, transparency, viscosity, alcohol % and more, and a spectrum analysis can define all its components with great accuracy. But no one can persuade you how it tastes. It’s only ... | |
I don't want to beat a dead horse but I'm bugged. Evaluation of the quality of a design is important.... But there is many design quatitative product, and yet a great varieties of acoustic implementation... Recreating with the original acoustic digitalized or analog information conveyed by the ... | |
I don't want to beat a dead horse but I'm bugged. I think what most designers mean when they say accuracy is that the wave form doesn’t change from input to output. This is electronical accuracy... This is not acoustic and psych-acoustic "accuracy" which is a word anyway not used in acoustic ... | |
objective vs. subjective rabbit hole Anyway, the time is already here where A.I. will manage acoustic perfectly and his link to the gear system and vice versa...Way "better" than any human acoustician... It is already here in art and design, suppressing artists jobs on the net an... | |
Jazz for aficionados Wow! i like hammond organ very much... Very good selection i listen to it for some time now.. Thanks this make my day.... jim5559 05-04-2022 at 09:26am I don’t think this was ever on here . | |
I don't want to beat a dead horse but I'm bugged. In acoustic and psycho-acoustic no scientist use the term "color" in the same pejorative way, like some subjective EXTERNAL quality added to a sound which must be eliminated because the sound must be only "accurate"...This is completely wrong... ... | |
objective vs. subjective rabbit hole Without measurements there is no acoustic treatment well done... Without measurements there is no mechanical room tuning controls... Why? Because the BALANCE between reflective/absorbing /diffusive surfaces is the KEY... but it is not enough, e... |