glupson
Responses from glupson
| Talk but not walk? prof,Thank you for your compliments, but I do not think I deserve them. I do not even think I am using any kind of critical thinking here (this forum), if I even ever do it anywhere except at work. I am approaching these things with some lightness... | |
| Talk but not walk? Michael Green,Why wouldn't an, for example, amplifier work to manufacturer's specification once received straight from the factory? Ties, rods, rings, whatever else, in place as manufacturer left it. I am not talking about some packaging material,... | |
| Talk but not walk? geoffkait,My mentioning of me talking the talk, as practically worthless as it was, and saying that whoever would do what I imagined while not having anything better to do would be the person walking the walk meant just that. The one who fills the... | |
| Talk but not walk? geoffkait,That is the beginning of what I was thinking about in my hypothetical room, or let’s say that room that you had copied the article about. Although, I was, in my mind, playing with multiple variables of the equation. I was mostly wonderin... | |
| Talk but not walk? prof,I kind of enjoyed this thread. Probably due to its bizarre turns. There were inexplicable characters, weird responses ("your adult diapers are elastic", or something to that effect), some concise and sharp observations, strange non-questions,... | |
| Talk but not walk? Michael Green,I just noticed your post and am glad I did not end up being a troll. I do think that both you and prof have taken your arguments too seriously. I tried to stay in the middle, focusing on more tangible things. | |
| Talk but not walk? prof,do not take it too personally. You could not win. It seems that I became a troll, too, despite fully in good faith trying to explain why people cannot afford trial and error approach on everything. In fact, many would agree that it would be f... | |
| Talk but not walk? Which trolls? | |
| Talk but not walk? "...why do so many HEA hobbyist talk theory without any, or very limited, empirical testing or experience?"Michael Green,I think I may have an answer for you on this one.For most of the hobbyists, this is hobby. It is not work. Most do not have we... | |
| Talk but not walk? geoffkait,I am very real. Laminar flow, Reynolds number, DREs, and whatever else. Unfortunately, my questions remain unanswered.Wondering what someone with experience, website, and business about changing the way rooms "sound" would think about a ... | |
| Talk but not walk? testpilot,It seems that you accidentally placed word "back" into your answer about ice-cold water. "Refracting back" would be back to where it came from which is speaker and not listener. Of course, that is assuming that listener is not positioned... | |
| Talk but not walk? geoffkait,I tried to compare your (shadorne and you) statements and cannot find contradiction. I will leave it at that.Your other pop quiz question, no matter how inspiring it may be, is not valid as a question due to too many variables that can c... | |
| Talk but not walk? Shadorne,Thank you.I was not even trying to go into that debate. I tried to clarify validity of statement from MG website that puzzled me. My question was this..."Sound shutters organize the laminar flow that travels along the wall and ceilings" (... | |
| Talk but not walk? geoffkait,In interest of not extending the argument who said it first, I will accept that it was you who put it more precisely described although I intended to say exactly the same with my "...as stationary walls are not exactly moving in one dire... | |
| Talk but not walk? prof,I can feel your pain but, at the same time, I think you took this thread too close to your heart. Babbling over the Internet with/against some other girls and guys should not be taken that seriously, I think. As much as I may agree with prett... |