geoffkait
Responses from geoffkait
| Which is the best audio magazine? cd318Peter Aczel was a man of strong views but he had an enormous amount of experience in audio. He could be described as the James Randi (supernatural sceptic/ buster) of the audio world. His views were never refuted and its unlikely they ever wi... | |
| Interconnects and non-believers unreceivedogma sure is barking a lot for a low poster. Is there a full moon? By the way isn’t unreceiveddogma misspelled? | |
| New Tweak --- Its Fantastic Rules? Where we’re going we don’t need rules. We’re going back. Back to the...future! | |
| New Tweak --- Its Fantastic I’ve already filed amg56’s comments under blah, blah, blah. | |
| Speakers on speaker stands-isolation ideas? @amg56 I know you are but what am I? | |
| Interconnects and non-believers Sorry guys, when I use the word directional I’m referring to unshielded cables, interconnects, power cords, hdmi cables, etc. The shielding is a separate issue. | |
| Speakers on speaker stands-isolation ideas? amg56I had to look up Sorbothane on the net. I've never heard of it before. It could be marketed in Aust. under a different product name.That’s odd. Sorbothane has been part of the audiophile vocabulary for what, gotta be 30 years. Has Aussie land... | |
| New Tweak --- Its Fantastic Tom, I’ve asked you several times to explain what in Tarnation you’re talking about. The last time I asked you to explain, a couple weeks ago, you copped out by saying you had to catch a plane. So, I’ll ask you again. Instead of repeating the same... | |
| Which is the best audio magazine? roberjermanThe two Peters (Aczel and Moncrieff) remain the best objectivest reviewers in print to this day! And hated by the "golden ears" crowd!>>>>Well, I’m not sure I’d say they were hated. Ridiculed maybe. Laughed out of town? Used... | |
| Talk but not walk? 12 Angry Men quotesJuror #2: It’s hard to put into words. I just think he’s guilty. I thought it was obvious from the word, ’Go’. Nobody proved otherwise.Juror #8: Nobody has to prove otherwise. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. The defen... | |
| New Tweak --- Its Fantastic tommyliongeoffkait,please take your personal battles with other members elsewhere, and stop polluting this thread.Calm down, tommy boy. You’re not even in this thread. | |
| New Tweak --- Its Fantastic rel, maybe change your moniker to derel. But seriously, don’t you have anything better to do? I’m filing your posts under Who Cares? | |
| New Tweak --- Its Fantastic No, not really. They just seem creepy, frankly. Did you suffer a head trauma? | |
| New Tweak --- Its Fantastic Sorry, my interest, such as it was, is rapidly waning, Tom. But good luck with that. | |
| New Tweak --- Its Fantastic relSorry, Geoff, but son of an English professor or not, you're just flat-out wrong.Any form of argument where the conclusion is assumed in one of the premises. Many people use the phrase “begging the question” incorrectly when they use it to mean... |