frogman
Responses from frogman
| Jazz for aficionados O-10, you, sir, are not a music lover; you are a music opportunist. And, you just corroborated everything that I wrote previously; not that it was necessary. Why do I feel like I need to go take a shower?1973? | |
| Jazz for aficionados Fabulous! What a heart warming story. Gareth Malone is a saint. And, the next time someone says "either you got it or you don't".......Thanks for sharing. | |
| Jazz for aficionados O-10, I realize that there is no hope of you ever cutting out the crap, because it’s obvious that you feel threatened by my presence on this thread. As I said before, if you’re looking for an argument please look elsewhere. I wasn’t aware that any... | |
| Jazz for aficionados ****Frogman, can you be musically and politically correct?****Are you asking whether I can be, or are you asking whether ONE can be? Also, what do you mean by "musically correct"?****What is your assessment when comparing "free jazz" to what I co... | |
| Jazz for aficionados 1972:Miles ups the ante with "On The Corner". One of my favorites from this period. Love the grooves. Some of the nastiest guitar sounds ever and Dave Liebman kills on saxophone:https://m.youtube.com/watch?list=PLA0077F372BB485C8&v=Ps0ka1tY... | |
| Jazz for aficionados Not sure why I should be weeping from reading the Wiki; but, I agree with your statement about language and culture (you can add borders to the mix). The problem is, and we've been having this argument for quite some time, that as concerns art (m... | |
| Jazz for aficionados That's actually very funny!Heard this on WBGO today and thought I would post it in case you might be too distressed with the recent topic. Good segue to your funny:https://m.youtube.com/watch?list=PL15243F255ACDA1EC&v=DZjcLUK5px4Btw, hang in t... | |
| Jazz for aficionados I have no clue what you are saying O-10, please clarify. But, before you go about making any rash decisions (😱) please take a closer look at the most recent exchange and see who it was that first made a comment that turned things personal. I wil... | |
| Jazz for aficionados ****and I'll give it top priority.****Excellent! | |
| Jazz for aficionados I just read some of the most recent posts. I had not read them before posting my most recent. A couple of thoughts:While I certainly have no issue with discussing any and all genres while any one genre is being discussed "in depth" (not!), I mus... | |
| Jazz for aficionados ****Frogman's leading this parade****I am? I thought O-10 was, since he brought up the topic. Lead? Too scary, given recent history here 😬. But, hey, somebody has to do it. I already expressed my opinion that a chronological perspective is ke... | |
| Jazz for aficionados And, btw, I highly recommend signing up for Ted's mailing list for very interesting jazz news, commentary and peeks into JALC. | |
| Jazz for aficionados A slight (☺️) detour before getting back to fusion. I thought some, and Rok in particular, would appreciate this. Ted Nash of JALC, friend and one of the biggest young(er) talents on the scene today writes about Joe Temperley, longtime baritone ... | |
| Jazz for aficionados ****are you ready to go into fusion in depth; I mean to cover it to your hearts content, rather than just skim over it?****Sure, and I’m glad to see that you want to cover it in depth, because all too often "skim over it" is exactly what has happe... | |
| Jazz for aficionados ****but not near the level I have been accustomed from by either artist.****How so? Could you expound on that please. Thanks. |