Am I a burning out audiophile????


...or am i simply a music lover to begin with???

Disregarding the debate that could potentially be born from the statement above, I sit here in my 18x18x8 room listening to Diana Krall's 'When I look in your eyes' through a pair of Totem Winds powered by a Krell kav-400xi and Jolida JD100a source. It sounds great, it truly does! It does so many things right and so little wrong! Why then, do I have the question in the back of my mind - 'is this system as musically engaging as my past system was?'

Tonally, it's better. It goes deeper. It's more accurate, smooth, well balanced, etc. etc. etc.

The prior system the back of my mind questions is that of the Totem Arros powered by a PrimaLuna Prologue Two with Cairn Fog source in a 9x11x8 room. If memory serves me correct - pure magic! What I thought at the time (and am wondering now) was the epidomy of emotional involvement!

Q.1 - am I only remembering the 'good times' with the prior system? (like how we photograph only the good times of our life and wax nostalgic about how great things used to be)

The move to the upgraded system was initiated by my desire to listen to more music with my wife. Today, (and last night, and the night before...) I still find myself listening by myself. Regardless of the extra chairs in larger space!

I also wanted to simplify and combine my seperate systems (5.1HT and 2-channel) into one higher-end 2-channel dual purpose system. The result is great sound, but perhaps not the most musically enagaging two-channel nor the most enveloping, impactful HT either? As a dual purpose system it performs great, but it isn't send ingtingles down my spine or have me toe-tapping like the smaller Arro system did.

Q.2 - have I gone too far??? Have I treaded into water where I have to think about the music too much to enjoy it??? Am I asking too much of a single system???

The road from system #1 to system #2 has had a lot of in-between systems that have just led to frustration and/or musical dissatifaction, but too much too get into detail here...

Q.3 - which brings us back to where I started; am I a burning out audiophile??? Am I simply thinking about this too much???

I don't know what I expect in response to this babble? I don't know if these questions are even 'real' or simply part of a rhetorical rant? Anyway, thanks for listening and feel free to post and thoughts or comments....
jh2os
I have to agree that the room is the most likely culprit. In time as you listen you may identify the room resonances that may be present. There is lots of material on this site about room treatment. There is a simple way to test the theory. Cover three walls of the room with blankets, duvets, drapes, carpeting, whatever you can lay your hands on. You will then be listening to your system without most of the room effects. Most find this quite an eye (ear) opening experience. Then you can plan more appropriate treatments to get the required effect.

My listening room has one wall naturally covered in curtains because it is all glass. Two more walls have curtain rails fitted along the top with curtains that are drawn into the corners normally. When I do serious listening I simply draw the additional curtains across the walls. The effect is amazing. The carpeting on the floor also helps.
Let me hazard a guess....

Perhaps you are facing diminishing returns...a good $1000 speaker (Arros) can do a pretty good job when well placed in an appropriate small sized room with unchallenging material like female vocal and acoustic guitar. Under certain conditions the LF cutoff of a smaller speaker gives better balance than a full range one (because LF room modes can get out of hand easily and boominess can cloud your ability to hear the lower midrange).

My experience: I still like my Energy 22's from 1983 (less than $800 new at that time). Do the Energy 22 have huge dynamics, startling mid range clarity and ability to play at all levels (including extremely loud) whilst maintaining balance, low distortion and without sounding compressed and boomy? Can Energy 22's fool me into thinking I am at a live venue with realistic live SPL levels? The answer to both these questions is absolutely NOT. However, do the Energy 22's still sound great and pleasing at moderate levels on most source music ...ABSOLUTELY! Would Energy 22's still be enough for me if I lived in a small appartment with neighbours that I had to respect...ABSOLUTELY!

Your old Arros were a great speaker and still are. If you don't feel the Totem Winds are a huge improvement you may want to check your room modes out (test CD & Rat Shack meter). Or simply just crank it up a bit...that is where a higher $$$ design will shine giving you crystal clear sound even at realistic music levels. Also try something a bit more challenging and get yourself some excitement rather than the ever so pleasant (boring) Krall....like Tower of Power What is Hip (Soul Vaccination Album) or Seal "Crazy" or something from Mahler or dare I say it, try some Angus air guitar kicking circles around the floor... "Back in Black".

Like a Barchetta sports car...if you use it for groceries at 30 MPH the benefits will not be very apparent....let it rip on a challenging winding country road...ahh Sunlight on chrome, The blur of the landscape, Every nerve aware....
The main body of the room is actually 17'8x18'8, and is open to a 8'x12' alcove on one side and a 4'x10' dormer on the other so it is not as bad as I may have led you to beleive...

...however, Erasmusj, your idea is an interesting one.

Soundlogic, your statement sounds logical. ;) I think you may be onto something there and it is something I find myself wondering as well!

I know this is good equipment and it does sound good, I am just THINKING about my system more now than ever before!

Before I had the bright idea to combine & have the money to get 'better' electronics, I didn't really question what the next best thing was, I just enjoyed the system. I need to get off this train!!!
Shadorne, you are absolutely correct. On more complex musical sources the Winds do out perform the Arros and at higher volumes levels as well. They outperform them on many levels and in many noticible ways. I am disturbed as while I can easily discern this and even enjoy these added benefits, something just doesn't quite seem right - the emotional engagement.
Many of us- thrilled by the musical high induced by our systems- seek to make the experience better. With some things you buy, the synergies click and there's magic. With other components, there's less synergy adding up to less emotional involvement with the music, hence less satisfaction.

Isn't this just how life is?

I think often of a line from Paul Simon that I think is central to all human experience:

"The thought that life could be better, is woven indelibly into our hearts- and our brains"

Enjoy the music.