2. pc-audio
  3. 1226086938

External DAC vs. your quality processor

As I work on completing the path of music from iMac to Maggies there comes the issue of: Should I consider an external DAC or rely on the DAC in my Krell HTS7.1 to do the work. Perhaps others have dealt with this issue and discovered that, indeed, their processor handles the DAC work very well without the need for an expensive external DAC. Afterall, when you have spent big bucks on a quality processor it would be a shame to find out that you need to shell out more big bucks for a DAC because the processor under-performs. I'm also struggling with Toslink vs. USB.

If you have had similar decisions to make, your comments are welcome.
puerto
puerto OP
372 posts
 
Objective1; Thanks for the response - Just to be sure I have it right - can I assume then that in the computer to Bel Canto to Krell 400xi set-up that you prefer the DAC work in the Bel Canto to a more direct Computer to Krell (digital in) set-up because you feel that the Bel Canto offers better DAC work than your Krell?
audioengr
3,282 posts
 
I've heard a lot of processors and a lot of DAC's. I have yet to hear a SS processor that holds a candle to a good DAC. My Proceed AVP is not bad, one of the more musical ones, but nothing compared to a good DAC.
gunbei
2,327 posts
 
Awhile ago, I decided I didn't like the sound of SS processors for music. Since then, I discovered I like non-OS DACs or tube DACs, neither of which would make sense in an HT pre/pro.

It does seem like HT processors these days have become better at rendering music. I guess it really depends on what you're looking for in the 2-channel presentation.
More to discover