Lamm ML 2.1 SET vs ASR Emitter II, DartZel


If you had to compare a tube amp with the best of solid state amps, how would the Lamm ML 2.1 differ from the other two above. I am planning on either the VonSchweikert VR-7, or the Wilson Max II speakers which are both efficient speakers. All kinds of music, EMM labs front end, preamp optional with EMM.
dbk
The ASR and Dartzeel are IMPORTED & OVERPRICED GOODS. You can buy as good or better solid state domestically and safe the fortune. The downside is that none of them will sound as good as LAMM ML 2.1 or CAT JL-3 Signature, there are few other alternatives.

Good luck

Regards, Tommy
Is this HiEnd rock/paper/scissors? Does IMPORTED Overpriced goods beat DOMESTIC overpriced goods? All of the above mentioned could be categorized the way you mention. Unfortunately, some of the best sounding out of the box conventionally built and manufactured gear is named above. Why would you differentiate between domestic and imported? Value is relative to where you are and what price you put on it. Is the Lamm M2.1 a value compared to the ASR? I am not so sure. I can say I own(ed) or have heard all of the above gear and it all depends on your listening preferences, partnering equipment and room. Listen to as much as you can in your own system then make the call.

Also, we should know if some of these comments come from a dealers perspective, in the interest of full disclosure. It doesn't change the validity of your opinion, but don't put yourself in the position of being a troll
I was wondering when someone would post about the ASR amp.
If old HP says it revolutionary, I'd take the time to give
it a listen.

I like the idea of less boxes, less interconnects, less power cords...etc.

Since as you point out, the VR-7 and Wilson Max II speakers are both efficient speakers and will work well with a number of different amps, I'd decided on which speakers will work best in your listening room, and then shop for electronics.