Virtual Dynamics - David vs Nite II vs Master


I tried the David series - digital connect, XLR IC's, SC's and PC on my CDP. I liked them but decided to get the Nite II instead - more $ must be better? I still like the Nite II's more than some previous brands I tried, just not sure if I like them more than the David's - however, it was a few months between the David and the Nite II (using Transparent Ultra XL's) so I am going by memory. I'm considering the Master series. Has anyone compared the 3 levels in the same set-up within a reasonable time frame? I read that Master is a big jump from Nite, but not sure if they meant Nite or Nite II. Thanks for all any feedback. Jim
128x128jim63
I have traveled the same path...and yes the Master series is a significant step up from the Nite II. Nuance detail, imaging and silent background all improve while maintaining the completely natural 'house sound'. I am in the process of replacing my entire Nite II XLR and AC cables to Master. Enjoy. Peter
Frankly, I was not impressed with the Nite II cables. I felt the Audeince was much more musical. I have had the orignal Nite power cords and then the Nite II cables in my system at various times and while they are clear and dynamic sounding (like the original power cord was) I never felt that the music real sounding.

Now my buddy is sending me his Master cables to try out and he told me he preferred them over the Audience by 20-30% so I will post again if I hear what he is hearing.

Happy Listening