CAT pre-amps


I have read some comments on the great soundstage of these amps. Are they way better than say, the BAT pre-amps. If CAT's are not the best, what is?
merle
I have a CAT sig. mk. III and although I have only heard a BAT preamp once( I dont remember which model ) it has been my impression that the CAT gives one of the largest soundstages around. This is all also dependent apon one's other equipment, speakers, room set up, etc. The CAT also has a rich prominent midrange. A great preamp for Jazz, classical , voice , etc. Also one of the better phono-sections. Hope this helps-Jim
I have the CAT mk. III which I bought after auditioning a mid level spectral and the top of the line cary. The CAT struck me as the most natural of the 3; the Cary was more romantic (but I could easily live with it) and the spectral seemed to 'extract more detail' (as they always say). I think in general you'll find better soundstaging with tubes overall.
The CAT is the most un-collered pre-amp on market, it has one of the best phono section available, very un-collered. The preamp can change sound signiture bassed on tubes in unit, factory tubes sound hard, if replace with NOS tubes unit can sound warm and romantic or very detailed, depending on soun preference. The new unit Ultimate is better than MKIII, but not at the price differential. You can buy used MKIII for around $2700, great deal.