XLR or single ended cables and why?


Few audio equipments reviewers swear by their reputation if there is any that XLR connections improve quality of the sound sonically. Some stated there is none. Can someone scientifically help me to make a wise decision to choose between XLR and singled-ended cables?
andrewdoan
In my limited experience, I tend to agree with balanced cables for balanced electronics. Krell states that both components you have are balanced. Nothing to get excited or impatient about. Mortgage or rent, food, beer, and some good CD's come first.
Ghostrider45,

You are right that I have oversimplified.

RCA uses ground to carry half of the signal whilst XLR uses an additional wire. Signal levels are different as well. Circuits are designed differently too. Using the chassis for carrying part of the signal (RCA) does run an increased risk of picking up noise. A larger signal (balanced) with shielded cables (XLR) will be relatively more immune to noise.

But all this is really splitting hairs when considering most domestic applications. Many consumer grade equipment manufacturers offer only RCA connections and for good reasons; the majority find these circuit designs/connections perfectly acceptable.
Technical reasons only - don't read this if you have a headache...

You have to consider the signal transfer through the cables and also the quality of the circuits on both ends.
Balanced circuits are more complicated, so more things can "go wrong" with them. If you go by the motto "the simpler - the better" then you'd probably prefer single-ended circuitry. There is a reason why SET amps are popular...

Now for the cables themselves. On a technical basis, cables have two signal wires in opposite phase. Logically, it is best to arrange these two wires in a balanced geometry (even for RCA cables) **AND** equalize the magnitude of the currents flowing in them. The electromagnetic fields of the two wires will cancel each other, so you get the least leakage (i.e. noise) from this cable. In addition, the geometrical balance will reject externally-induced noise.
Balanced circuits almost always guaranty the above condition for the equal magnitude of currents. Single-ended circuits do not always adhere to that. The reason is that the single-ended stereo (or multi-channel) circuits usually **SHARE** a common ground. The currents generated by the Left channel driver **CAN** flow in any ground wire in any interconnect, since they are all shared electrically, and have roughly the same resistance.
It is a different situation if the grounds are electrically seperated. Such is the case with a true dual-mono implementations or monoblock amplifiers, if they don't share grounds with an external ground wire or through the AC ground.
Confusing? Perhaps a little bit...
Bototm line is, that for your interconnect to do a good job - you either go balanced (guaranteed "success") or pay special attention to your single-ended setup. Anything else will compromise the symmetry of current flow in your interconnect and would make them possibly the "weakest link"in your system.
Tvad wrote:

"standard rca audio interconnects use only a single "unbalanced" conductor.

This is not true. Single ended RCA terminated cables use two conductors. One positive, the other negative. The (+) carries the signal away from the source. The (-) carries the signal back towards the source. Both conductors have an equal effect on sound quality. For this reason, one should never use audio rca cables in which the (-)conductor is a braided shield.

A balanced XLR cable also carries two signals. One being in-phase, the other out of phase. A third ground wire allows the ground potential between the components to "equalize".
" For this reason, one should never use the one with(-) as braid shield."

Tvad, would you please explain a bit more. Most of my ICs have one (+) connected to the pin the other (-) connected to the outer side of the ring on top of it is the barrells. Except for Kimber ICs where they use up to three conductors.