cd recorder vs. computer burner


can someone, in a couple of sentences or less, explain why a cd recorder will produce a more accurate vf recording than a computer burner?
loomisjohnson
Stand-alone CD recorder is best for a simple one-box solution, with everything already designed to work a certain way (which can be good or bad). Disadvantages are slow burning, and very limited editing capability . . . and usually you have to use special "CD-R music" discs, rather than "CD-R data" discs.

The computer route is far fussier for acheiving high sound quality, as you have to personally take responsibility for finding a good audio interface ("sound card"), setting up the software, making sure the drivers or OS doesn't screw things up, organising and taging the music files in a way that preserves the audio quality and makes them easy to find, using a reliable cd burner drive, etc. A real pain, but if you want to easily edit the contents or quickly burn multiple copies, it's very much worth it.

These days, I use a computer for live recording . . . but sometimes the editing still seems like more of a hassle than in the days when I could simply cut and splice analog tape. But I definately don't miss having to quickly swap reels between pieces, or the cost of the tape itself.
I think the basic points have been made well in the previous posts.

It's not clear if you are talking about burning digital files on the one hand, or analog sources which are digitized by the computer or cdr on the other hand. If the latter, the digitizing (a/d conversion) is being done in the computer by what is undoubtedly (by audiophile standards) a lo-fi chip and circuit, which is surrounded by all kinds of potent digital noise generators.

If you are talking about burning digital files, I too would strongly suggest a burn rate which is substantially less than the rating of the media.

And I too am curious as to what "vf recording" means. Voice frequency? Ventricular fibrillation?:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VF

Regards,
-- Al
to solve the great mystery, "vf" is an inadvertent typo--i meant to type "cd" but misfired. my specific quest in starting the thread is to seek insight as to why a cd burned on the standalone cdr sounds different (and, to my ears, truer to the original) than the computer burned copy.
thanks for the responses, y'all
Just for the record, the pro and semi-pro standalone CD recorders like my Tascam do not require anything special in the way of blank CDRs and CD-RWs. Dave
LOL! We should have realized that. "v" and "f" are right next to "c" and "d," respectively, on the keyboard.

Regards,
-- Al