How can you not have multichannel system

That last reply was belated response to Tbg's comment on or about 1-6-09

Mig007, if you think my posting is anything like your initial post, I think there is no value in any discussion with you.

Yeah, both comments mirror each other in tone and intent. We both had experiences where we felt nothing else could compare to our listening experiences due to, in your case a preamp, and in mine, the multichannel music. Our comments were tinged with exuberance bordering on what some may perceive as arrogance. The only difference is I can admit to it, but you are in denial.

Mig007,"I just finished listening to Allman Bros 'Live at the Fillmore East" on SACD, and cannot believe the 2-channel 'Luddites' who have shunned multichannel sound. They probably shun fuel injected engines as well. Oh well, their loss, but Kal has it right."

tbg, "I have had the final production version for two weeks now. I loved the first one I had and thought it out-imaged anything I ever had, while having neither a tube or ss sound. Then I got the new one. I was unprepared for how much better it was. There is a sonic hologram before me with realism I have never heard or even approached before. Roger Paul tells me that it will be weeks before it is at its best. Lookout for another even more rave review. In 28 years of audio experimentation, I have never heard more of an improvement by adding one component."

I am sorry, but it is you who cannot admit to intemperate language, such as you are in denial, or professor of intolerance. You need help with civility I'm afraid.

Sure, if you leave out the title of your thread which is the culprit and the subject of my retort. My subject matter also is more divisive and known, and could be articulated in that vein. Intermperate language? You must be a prisoner in one of those ivy towers, and rarely get out into the mainstream population.