Digital is far better than vinyl

Comparing "digital" en masse to "analog" is equivalent to comparing karate to jiu jitsu. Which is better?

The answer: well, you need no answer.

The better prepared, stronger, fitter will always win.

When looking at equivalent levels of mastery, then the answer is: each are specialists of something. Do you want to knock out your opponent, or restrain him?

Digital tend to be more suitable for bigger groups of people, A/B evaluations, getting a good show, listening to the latest recordings, short sessions.

Analog is more suitable for finding the substance, lone whole night listening, touching soul an spirit, invoking memories that you thought were gone forever with force that takes away your breath.

Digital wants you to focus on the virtues of your gear. Analogue lets you flow with the music.

Of course, poor digital will focus on the weaknesses of your system, and poor analog will annoy you with issues you do not have with digital.

I could care less whether this is a joke/satire or not. However, I wonder how many audiophiles actually know why the vinyl sounds better than digital if that is indeed the case (I was convinced), given the fact that the theoretical dynamic range (DR) of a perfect LP is in the range of 60-70dB, much less than the digital system whose DR is often well above 90dB in the neighborhood of 110-120dB. At least I have yet discovered the perfect theory thru this forum.

As always, it comes down to what you prefer. I think digital sound better. It is also way more cost effective. But..  I have heard analog sound excellent. Set up what you like and enjoy your system. Also to remember to chill and enjoy the music you prefer. You can argue about genre on the next post.

OP,

+1

We need to move on to Qubit music. It will sound like both analog and digital, and yet not sound like either of them at the same time.