Here is why the compliance of the cartridge might have something to do with one’s impression of the enabler. Low compliance cartridges naturally tend to put a lot of energy back into the tonearm. The enabler is an interface between the cartridge and the tonearm. I don’t know whether that will be good or bad. But high compliance cartridges might be less affected by the addition of an Enabler, because the cartridge suspension already dissipates energy.
Origin live Cartridge Enabler - a review
This is a basic review aimed at those who are in a similar
middle lane of the audiophile analogue motorway.
Enhancements are plentiful for turntables and provoke much intense debate.
However I feel as though the use of them is particularly relevant for those
like me who have turntables at a lower end level.
So after much review and forum research I decided on Origin live also because I
could save on delivery by obtaining a few items at the same time. Analogueseduction
is another good option in this regard. Unfortunately, the platter mat I also ordered hadn’t
been packed, so I only had their brush and the enabler to enjoy.
I`m aware that the theory is to channel unwanted disturbances from the cartridge into the arm, but I`ve always considered that just damping them would be better. Anyhow that in simple terms is the Enablers job.
The turntable itself is a 1990`s Roksan Xerses, the (platter is aluminium). I have an old Ringmat as platter mat at present. The arm an SME IV, the cartridge a VD Hul retipped Koetsu Black.
I became familiar with a fine pressing of Alan Parsons Eve, first track Lucifer which has quite a lot of detail before installation of the Enabler.
So installation was a bit fiddly, and note well, you will need bolts that are at least 5 mm longer to successfully complete the job. I made every effort to set the VTA as it was before installation, and checked alignments and the settings to make sure that they hadn’t changed.
The very first impression is that the sound is slightly thinner. Straight after that you realize that is because some of the – ringing, bloom? has been removed. So for example, a percussive tap, ting or knock is more definite. Again the bass is slightly lighter, but far less boomy. I player a Peter Gabriel track that sounded overblown in the bass when I listened a couple of days before. Now the bass was tuneful and balanced in tone with the rest of the instruments.
So initial impressions are ones of a satisfactory improvement, and again I maintain that with more modest equipment, if care is taken with the details, the end result can result in a worthwhile improvement. So as the professional reviewers say – highly recommended!
- ...
- 31 posts total
Does anyone have any experience with the Funk Firm "Houdini" which is a cartridge decoupler? It apparently performs the same function as the "Enabler", but is considerably thicker. Upgrades — The Funk Firm |
I have the enabler but have not installed it yet,it will be going up against Mapleshades Nanomount system which I have had for many years with different arms and cartridges and like the Enabler it isolates the cartridge from the arm but also isolates the arm from the armboard with the nanomounts,it did improve stage and LP surface noise but was a pain lining up the nanomounts.The Enabler was very inexpensive and looks easier to install [I hope] so what the heck I will give it a try.About SR PHT green is a keeper,I had both strains the one that I lost was the more focus one and the green is also focus sounding.Yes it works. |
- 31 posts total