Are 'Thin-Tower' Speakers Voiced for HT?


These inexpensive tower speakers are a very crowded segment. They usually sell from between 1000-2000, and have very good bass response for their size and price, offering the seemingly impossible for audiophiles on a budget. They especially appeal to those of us who have been living with bookshelves, and want an upgraded, more full range sound.

Looking around the web sites for some of the mfg's, some openly claim that the speakers 'work well' as L/R channel speakers in a HT system. Most who admit this also add, as an afterthought, that the speakers are excellent for music, too.

Other mfg's simply market them as audio speakers, and add (again, as an afterthought) that they make excellent HT speakers!

Now, my understanding is that good HT speakers will be slightly forward in the mid range, as this makes dialog more audible and clear. Reading most of the reviews of these products, many of the reviews indeed include praise for the speakers' midrange reproduction, and for their suitability with Jazz and vocals.

Is it true that for $1000-2000 audio budget, a bookshelf speaker made specifically for 2 channel audio would be the better choice for music fans, and that if one desires a full range floor stander, one should be prepared to spend appreciably more for a pair voiced for music, or use a good sub made for 2 channel audio?

Is this a prevalent problem in the speaker market today, that mfg's are trying to kill two birds with one stone, and find the HT market appealing for it's profit potential, but don't want to lose it's traditional audio customers? So they build and design speakers that sound good in a HT environment, but take care to market them to both audiences.

I'm just wondering, because I don't want a speaker that was designed with HT in mind, no matter how good they might sound for music. I want a speaker designed and voiced for music. Does anyone have any suggestions for differentiating the two kinds of products?

Terry
128x128rwinner
If its good for music, it should be good for main 2 channels of HT also.

In practice, it doesn't work as well in general the other way around, but there are always exceptions.
2 different arguments here, thin in home theater is for cosmetics, thin in 2 channel audio is for less speaker to cabinet defraction.
07-19-12: Rleff:
I can think of several that fall into this area;Merlin and Dunlavy are the 2 that stand out; there is no way that I would consider them voiced for home theater. These are both world class speakers and should be only judged as how they perform not their physical size.

Thanks for the recommendations. I forgot completely about Merlin - they're a great speaker!
07-19-12: Tom6897
Rwinner:
I am not sure I understand what you mean as "culprits".

I am suggesting that some of these speakers are designed so that those who buy them for HT will find them well voiced for this purpose. That is all I am saying. Not that they aren't perfectly good music speakers.

However, I think I'm more interested in speaker lines that were R&D'd solely on the basis of how well they reproduce 2 channel music. This may not always be determined by the ad copy or by the information posted on the web site. Prolly the best way to find out the philosophy behind a speaker is to talk to the designer.

Terry