CDP or DAC?


I want to get back to playing and enjoying my 500+ cd's!  Been listening 95% of the time to a nice high end turntable $15k+ setup but would also like to have the option of listening to my cd collection to where it sounds at least competitive with my vinyl enjoyment.

I have no interest in streaming just playing cd's.   Does it make more sense to go with a cdp or transport and separate dac?

Budget $5 - $15k.  Thoughts
bobheinatz
Transport and separate DAC 1000%.  If the tech changes on DAC’s it is a simple upgrade most companies offer software upgrades. You can also taylor the sound you like through the DAC options that are out there (chip. R2R. Tube stage). Try to stay a step ahead and enjoy the music!
I am relatively new to having a CD Replay Chain Set Up in my system.
I chose not too many years ago to add a CDP and play a few CD's from the collection used in a Vehicle.
A friend who was working extensively with CDP's offered myself a loan of one of their CDP's, and it was remarkably improved over my owned CDP.

I went through a Period where I was looking to attempt to add streaming to the System to experience this as well, and become interested in DAC's along with the streaming.

A Standalone DAC with the CDP was looking interesting as it made the Streaming method look like it was being partially prepared for .

A chance offer materialised for a Bespoke Built DAC with a design that incorporated  R2R, Valve Regulated Power Supply and Valve Output Stage.
I took the offer and have not looked back, it was so impressive with a CDP, I went for a New CDT and chose the PS Audio PWMP.
I heard the pairing in a HiFi event, where prior to be giving the demonstration of the CDT with my DAC, Vinyl Systems when combined with the Amplification and Speakers that were in use, was close to
$200 000 in retail value. 
The Digital Set Up, when played in the System and when being compared to the very expensive Vinyl Set, was a revelation.
It was a no brainer to choose the CDT as the partnering device for the DAC.

I have been a 90%+ Vinyl Replay  until the CDT > DAC arrived.
Now I am approx' 60% Vinyl vs CD replays. 

I have a selection of TT's and Tone arms and a choice of  Phonostages.  The Digital has shown certain Vinyl Front End configurations a clean set of heels.

My main used TT and Tone arm > Cartridge > Phonostage are in front of the Digital.
During the A/B demonstrations of each, there are commonly a proportion of the Digital replay , that it is thought would be great if the Vinyl could match it.
What is guaranteed is that if a LP or CD from the same artist is allowed  to run on for an extended play time. The replay will not be wished for in the different media, either media is totally satisfying.

There was a few secondary costs incurred through going down the
CDT > DAC route.
One: being the CD Collection is now increased 30 fold. 
Two: Is More Controversial', It took quite a few demonstrations with different designs of RCA COAX Umbilical Cables to find the Interface that really brought the CDT > DAC marriage to a performance that was to my unique preference.
Very recently a chance materialised to try cable with a different Signal Wire incorporated into the Cables Design.
This cable has been so impressive, it has superseded my previous Cable choice that I was confident that would no be surpassed, when it come to my preferences. 

With a prudent search, I can discover a CD that will cost very little, in many cases, less that the derivative of the deterioration of the Cartridge Stylus.
Working on the Basis a Cartridge will offer a 1000's Hours of usage,
a £2000 Cartridge can be a £2 per hour to use ancillary.
Using a CD periodically in place of the Vinyl LP extends the period of ownership for the Cartridge, prior to it becoming candidate for overhaul or replacement.     
 





   
@pindac  Are you able to share with us which DAC you went with?  The R2R, Valve Regulated Power Supply and Valve Output Stage is very intriguing to me.

Also, which coax cable seem to be the best match for you?

Thanks much,
Don
I can't supply a Brand Name for the DAC as it is bespoke produced design and imported to the UK from Bulgaria.
The Seller on ebay is I believe known as NVKaudio and the Seller Name is nightyJJ. 
I was given a description that my Product is a design from a period when two Design Engineers were working together, and the Seller is one of those engineers.
I have tube rolled this DAC and it is using early a Matched Pair of early 60's Siemens and Halske E88CC. 

Beyond the experience with it in a very expensive system, it has been demonstrated in other systems, where the system owners are very experienced in using Digital, and the responses from the listeners are very positive.
A group of listeners were making up a audience on the Tube Rolling session, that took place on a System that has a Digital Front End Only.  
I have been informed on this occasion that  I am very fortunate to have been offered the DAC. 

The Cable I am now using is a Mitsubishi D.U.C.C
A Cable can be a make or break addition.
My investigations into Modern Produced Wires and the taking the learning to the place where I am now experiencing the Wires has been quite revelatory.
My OCC Copper and Silver Wires are now Superseded, and the Modern Design Wires are in place at the  Cartridge Tag Wires, DIN - RCA Phono, SUT/Head Amp > Phonostage, CDT > DAC and Speaker Wires.
D.U.C.C is used on the CDT > DAC and SUT/Head Amp > Phonostage .
PC Triple C is used at the other Interfaces. 

My demonstration of these wires to others has already set of a interest and very recently I am seeing reports of a flurry of purchases that are set into motion, as a result of word of mouth reports following demonstrations I have carried out.