What tests would you like all speaker reviewers to do for their reviews?

thorough battery of stereo imaging tests to check stability of stereo image at various angles outside of the classic equilateral triangle. aside from the maggie tympani III, the only other speaker i've heard which offers stable stereo imaging no matter where in the room you sit or stand, is the bose cinemate sr-1. also there should be tests of volume versus odd order harmonic distortion to ferret out speakers whose sound hardens at higher volumes. also bass extension versus power handling. some speakers can reproduce the 32' pipes at low volumes but turn up the dial just a bit and you get doubling or worse. 

Reviewer invites 5 of his audiophile friends over. They are blindfolded and listen to the the speaker being reviewed, mixed in with 4 other speakers rotated and sound matched and they list what they like and dislike about each.
Removing as much bias as possible gives the best result.
Comparing blind tests to other speakers would tell me alot about my likelihood of enjoying that speaker.

symphony orchestras playing dense large scale symphonic works familiar to most listeners. comment on transparency,compression,glare,smearing. speakers that do well here should be able to handle just about anything. a review without this is useless to me.

The acid test: listen.

I thought MC was advocating LSD for a second there. Of course if you’re “altered” enough all music starts to sound like Pink Floyd (allegedly) so it may not be the best test.

+3  for John Atkinson.  I've read him since he started more than 40 years ago.
In this time he has tested some 1,000 speakers and has build an unequalled authority.