Honest Amp Reviews: Impossible?


So, I’ve noticed a flood of class D junk hitting the market over the last several years. They come from many different brand names from people you’ve never heard of before like "VTV", to popular Internet-in-the-know brands like PS Audio to famous names like Marantz. One thing they ALL have in common: the complete inability to find honest reviews online for these products.

For example, let’s take for instance the Stellar series from PS Audio. Class D junk with the usual attempt to improve euphonics with some kind of input stage. They call this scheme class AD, I guess to differentiate all the other brands that do something similar. However, you’ll never see a review site point this out; they’ll comment briefly on the design and then dutifully call it class AD afterwards as if it isn’t just a class D amp like many others.

Next, the reviewer will invariably lie about the sound. This lying usually takes the form of lying by omission. They’ll gush about how beefy and controlled it is, how neutral it is, how wide and natural the soundstage is, etc. What they WON’T mention is how lifeless, flat, boring and ultimately fatiguing they ALL are. The buyer who doesn’t know any better has to find that out for themselves while he slowly grows to distrust anything a reviewer has to say about anything. So, the only way to actually get value out of a review is to see if a certain amp has the positive attributes you are looking for while trying to painstakingly research any problems it might have because the reviewer won’t mention them.

In addition to the lies of omission, there’s the usual con of giving certain gear to certain reviewers who will appreciate / like the piece. That Stellar will NEVER be put up against a Dan D’agostino or a Pass for example. This could be valuable to the buyer to see how a lesser amp stacks up against a high end one, but it’s not, apparently, useful to the reviewers. Why? Why is telling the whole truth about amps -- all gear really -- taboo?
madavid0
@madavid0  https://soundnews.net/

This site is gear toward headphone gear which have a lower price point than high brow A'gon gear. 
Although I am not really a fan of Class D I am not ready to dismiss this technology completely. However I am in no hurry to embrace it either. 

You are a fool to put any stock in the vast majority of audio reviews. Ad revenue is just the beginning of the myriad of problems present. The publication that claims to be the most pure is the one that I trust the least. 

Why most reviewers find it necessary to ascribe some sort of monetary value to the improved sound of more expensive gear is beyond me.  
@yyzsantabarbara Wow this reviewer actually tells the truth about class D (his review of the Keces S300):
If you are currently using a class-D amplifier and enjoy the hell out of it, then please stop here and go read some of my latest DAC reviews. If you are new to this or if you are curious about the best sounding amplifier topologies, then please carry on.
Ouch! Truth status: told. I think I'll pay attention to this guy.


He has not reviewed a wide variety of amps yet due to his location and costs. He is trying to get the Benchmark AHB2 to compare with the Keces S300. Read up on the Topping A90 headphone amp. I hope it gets to 95% of the Benchmark HPA4, if so, it is a giant killer in the headphone world.

After this post, I am going to demo the NAD M33 Class D amp and likely the Persona 3F speaker. I have to pay this dealer an invoice so he should be good to give me a demo even though I am not interested in buying either. I want to compare the Purifi with my AHB2.