Why no interest in reel to reel if you're looking for the ultimate sound?


Wondering why more people aren't into reel to reel if they're looking for the ultimate analog experience? I know title selection is limited and tapes are really expensive, but there are more good tapes available now than ever before.
People refer to a recording as having "master tape quality",  well you can actually hear that master tape sound through your own system and the point of entry to reel to reel is so much more affordable than getting into vinyl.  Thoughts? 
128x128scar972
Commercial reel to reel tapes sound truly horrible. I recently bought a few dozen, and they are much worse than I remembered.  I guess it is  because I am now comparing them to something other than how they sounded on my old 1970's system, and then they did not come close to D to D.  That is why the best RtR's were bypassed to make D to D LP's.  Instead of investing in this format, go to a concert or jazz club.  To me, buying into RtoR is as senseless as buying a Ferrari as an investment, and being unable to use it, except on very rare occasions.  Things are made to enjoy.  Investments are something else.
All of those great LPs recorded pre 1985 were recorded on RtR decks.  In the 80's we discovered that original master tapes contained much more information than was pressed into original LP grooves.  In fact we discovered that many classic, indeed cherished records were compromised to allow home playback on crude record changers.  Bass was cut below 75-80hz, then a 125hz bump was added, and HF was rolled off above 12khz.  (The conundrum was some of the new remasters were essentially what was on the tape with minimal editing, and the resulting LPs sounded so much different than what we were used to hearing.  Subsequent remasters were made to sound closer to the original LP so the new pressing became a better version of what was familiar.)     

If one wants true fidelity from back back in the golden era- well at least to the early/mid 80's than prerecorded RtR tapes can deliver a better sonic experience then most LP pressings.   Caveat is to seek only 7.5ips tapes and avoid anything at 3.75ips.

I have a restored Teac X2000r deck, and I have direct experience in how wonderful a clean RtR tape can sound.   I recently acquired an original Broadway cast recording of West Side Story, recorded at 7.5ips.  WOW !  I am literally sitting 10th row dead center and transported back to 1958.  A clean RtR tape blows away any other version- premium LP remaster, SACD, 24/96 download.    Miles Davis- Sketches of Spain, Dave Brubek- Take 5, Stan Getz-Gilberto, Stan Getz- Focus, and so on.   These tapes are PHENOMENAL !

I was lucky in acquiring my deck.  I found a lightly used example with full wooden case, rolling rack, flawless mouse ears.  I was able to resell the case and rack to pay for restoration by Sam Palermo.

RtR is not industry supported and it is not easy for hipsters to acquire RtR decks then quickly use them in their hipster caves with their hipster hoodie buddies.  There is time, effort and cost involved; much more than LPs which can be found for pennies and TT which can be found by the thousands at garage sales.

A clean RtR tape blows away any other version- premium LP remaster, SACD, 24/96 download.   Miles Davis- Sketches of Spain, Dave Brubek- Take 5, Stan Getz-Gilberto, Stan Getz- Focus, and so on. These tapes are PHENOMENAL !
  iopscrl - I totally agree with you.
I was thinking about this recently, when I came across an ad for a Revox reel to reel. 

Recently, some of my LPs have sounded like I was in the studio, listening to the master tape. That liquidy but crisp high frequency sound, with a climate- and acoustic-controlled environment. Everything wet and dry at the same time (I am getting nostalgic for those long ago days in the 80s and 90s, spent laying viola tracks in professional studios).

But then there was one particular L.P. that I realized, I liked better when it sounded like a record! Can't remember which one it was. 

Vinyl has a sound all its own. Yeah, some call it distortion, and while that may be technically true, the inherent negative connotations of that word make it not quite appropriate.

If I could acquire my favourite 25 or so recordings on tape, without breaking the bank, I woukd seriously consider getting a tape deck. Partially because I would like to record my piano quartet's next release as an all-analogue production, from beginning to end. But I have never released a vinyl record (since my band in the 80s, anyways), so I don't even know if mastering plants have the capability to cut from an analogue tape.
fusian
... I have never released a vinyl record (since my band in the 80s, anyways), so I don't even know if mastering plants have the capability to cut from an analogue tape.
They have, and they do.