Thumbs up for ultrasonic record cleaning


My Cleaner Vinyl ultrasonic record cleaner arrived today and it’s impressive.

Everything I’d read indicated that ultrasonic was the way to go, and now I count myself among the believers. Everything is better - records are quieter, less ticks and pops, more detail etc.

All my records had been previously cleaned with a vacuum record cleaner and were well cared for. Nonetheless, the difference is obvious and overwhelmingly positive.

Phil
phil0618
I’ve had my TDS meter for two weeks now. I checked the water last week that was changed a week prior, the ppm reading then was 40. A week later the ppm reading is 59. Remember, I pre-clean/steam every lp before it hits the US cleaner.
@jtimothya ,

IMO, saying rinses are unnecessary as a blanket statement, is false. Everyone has there own cleaner and depending upon how much is used, will vary and and getting all of the residue off will vary as well.

( "Time consuming" ..... we're all in the hobby of playing/cleaning vinyl records. If one in this hobby is concerned with time, maybe they should look for another hobby or software ?)
No worries @slaw  - If you prefer a DIY system that includes rinsing, go for it.  With a TDS meter reading of 40-59ppm I certainly would rinse.  It's good you're using a meter.

In the context of my DIY setup, rinsing is an unnecessary time-consuming step.  When I pull records out of the cleaning tank the water on them consistently measures 003-005ppm so no need to rinse.  I change the USC tank water if that number goes higher - that's typically after 65-75 records or so.

Each spends his time as he will. I confess I'd rather listen to music than clean records. 
@jtimothya ,

I’m using distilled water. What are you using?
..................................
I just testing clean distilled...showed 0 ppm
Versa-Clean undilluted...showed 1358 ppm
I miswrote...Versa-Clean ...showed 3189 ppm undilluted.

I think next time I replace the water, I'll check the new mixture with my meter and go from there.