'Unlistenable' early digital recordings?


Obviously, today’s engineering of digital masters is far superior than the early years. Some say that many CD’s from the early years are ’unlistenable’. I used to agree. But, over the past couple of years, I’ve spent considerable effort to clean up the power to each of my digital components. Now, early CD’s are quite listenable. They might not be ’audiophile quality’ but the music comes across just fine. No more digital nasties. No more glare or etch in the HF. No more excessive boominess in the LF. I’m definitely a clean power convert. So much so, that I recommend cleaning up the power before upgrading to a new DAC. What’s your experience?

steakster
Post removed 
It stinks history and education are tarnished by a butthole of an engineer and gear. Thank you to whoever said polishing a turd. It’s appropriate. 
I have the Bop til you drop LP and my old ears like the detail and dynamic range.
Are you saying that it was recorded digitally or were you referring to the CD version?
Just curious.. my hearing fades out as low as 9500 hz these days....not sure what I'm missing.  :-(
When Bop Till you Drop came out on LP it was one of the first digital recordings. IIRC the CD sounds very similar to the LP.

From wikipedia,

“Bop Till You Drop is Ry Cooder’s eighth album, released in 1979. The album was the first digitally recorded major-label album in popular music. Bop Till You Drop was recorded on a digital 32-track machine built by 3M.”