Differences between cd transports?

Oh gosh, Mr Kait:

Re the comment: "geoffkait14,247 posts03-12-2019 6:16amPhysics all the way down? Who talks like that? Oh, I know. An English major." 

From the FYI Department: "Physics all the way down" is a common locution among.... wait for it.... philosophers of science.

Philosophers of science? Sha-zam! So, I you were in the English Department after all. I bet you guys can sure talk some stuff. Do you guys wear, like, robes and stuff?

Sir.... You obviously do not have a clue about.... well, much of anything....  that pertains to electronics, physics.... i.e. the stuff that pertains to this issue of "directionality."

Enough.... You truly are a charlatan.

Gosh, are all philosophers of science so adept at name calling? What is this, the revenge of the nerds?

My SR fuses are absolutely directional.  As to most of my cabling, it becomes directional with use, with ICs marked on one end so that it is always inserted in the same direction.  

As to CD transports, I guess I'm lazy and prefer my one piece EAR Acute player with upgraded NOS tubes and superior cabling.  It sounds analog like, great bass, dynamic range and smooth highs.  The mids sound just like a good  LP.

I've always heard that the superior transports extract more information off he CD.  Until I have a split system of transport and DAC, I won't know how much better CDs can sound.