2. speakers
  3. 130885-93252

KEF R700 Opinions please

Recently I visited a show room that I discovered only a couple miles from my house. I was curious so I went in and got to talking with the manager. I am new to the "hobby," enjoy keeping an open mind and listening to others opinions. I asked him to play me what he thought were the "best" speakers in the $3k range in the store.

He played me the Magnepan 1.7i’s which sounded nice. Very detailed but not much meat on the bone so to speak. My Vandersteen 2ce Sig II’s have a lot more slam to them. He played me another speaker, which I cannot remember, and didn’t care for at all.

For sh*ts and giggles he put on a pair or KEF R700s. We were also talking about MQA at this point..

I told him I am a drummer so he must’ve assumed I would like Phil Collins, "In The Air Tonight."

First he played me the non-MQA version from Tidal. It sounded good....
Then he played the MQA version.

It was like the sound was emanating from the entire wall, which was probably 18" foot wide by 10’ foot high. The speakers completely disappeared into the room. Massive sound stage!!!

Questions:

- Does anyone have any opinions on the KEF R700’s? I know they go for $4k new but I’ve seen them for $2k used.
- Are they a highly regarded speaker in the industry/ among audiophiles? Should I care?
- Was my experience with MQA vs. non-MQA tracks typical with respect to having a massive sound stage? or did this have more to do with the room or the speaker itself?

128x128audionoobie
mofojo
2,202 posts
 
$1800 each
schubert
7,386 posts
 
KEF is one of the original high-end speaker makers .
Always have had good designs and built many great speakers .
You heard them , that's all that counts .
rotarius
431 posts
 
I like my R700 very much.  They do really well with all genres, particularly classical, which is most important to me.  I have owned many speakers in this price range and they are my favorite ones yet.  These guys do require a longer than usual break-in. They need 50+ hours to open up and even then I was not happy with the slightly metallic sounding vocals. This was finally resolved with further use and by disconnecting the internal jumpers between the binding posts and using external jumpers instead. Those knobs for the internal jumpers can rotate (back out) with cabinet vibrations and not make full contact.
kalali's avatar
kalali
1,977 posts
 

Regarding MQA vs. non-MQA content, in my experience the difference is not as dramatic as you described. In some recordings the music has an slightly better pace and sounds a little better with more detail but not much in soundstage depth or width. I must add my experience is only with MQA enabled Bluesound Node2 as a source, streaming Tidal HiFi. I wonder what made that dramatic of a difference if the only change was the content with everything else kept the same. All that aside, are you saying that the KEF R700 sounded significantly better than your 2CE Sigs? What other gear was being used in the dealer demo?

audionoobie's avatar
audionoobie OP
357 posts
 

Thanks all for the replies. 

@rotarius Glad your enjoying your R700s!

@kalali My only experience is also with MQA enabled Bluesound Node2 as a source, streaming Tidal HiFi, and that's what the dealer was using as well. I saw a Peachtree and a pair of Parasound mono blocks. Not sure which ones were being used. I may have to go back and get some more information.

I wouldn't say that the KEF R700 sounded better than the Vandys per se. Just more detail and a higher and wider soundstage. A lot of it could've been the amps and/or the room, which was considerably bigger than mine. My listening room is an upstairs bedroom in a Cape Cod. It's about 12' x 10' and has walls that angle with the roof line starting at about 4' high.

The KEFs, in the dealer's show room, threw a sound stage like I've never heard before. The bass wasn't nearly as extended as the Vandy's but the detail and sound stage were superb. And the MQA versions of Tidal tracks were damn near holographic.

More to discover