What SS preamp compares to a tube preamp


I'm not sure I want to make this change, but only exploring options. I would like to keep this purchase under $3000 new or used and I think that's about the price point to make it worthwhile.....not sure though.
0
I started with a few AVR's, then went to a B&K ref 50 which is very nice, finally to a VTL 2.5. I'm currently using the VTL but with the price of some tubes I'm considering going back to solid state. I have a few tubes that sound really nice, Mullard 4003, 4024, 1950's Siemens, Valvo, Brimar, etc....I have found good sound but there's always a compromise. Once I hit the right mid range, I lose some top end, sometimes vice-versa. Also the gain on the 2.5 is excessive, fair amount of hiss and I know tube rush is a side effect but this is just excessive gain... 20 db. I have tried attenuators but they take a little top end from the sound.

I'm not giving up on tubes, but just would like to hear what others have tried that have been in this situation. I don't need HDMI but would be nice, mainly would like a remote. I don't think an AVR can do what I want but maybe a dedicated preamp.

I thought about an Anthem but they have mixed reviews.....not really sure where to look.

All input and criticism appreciated.
dyl71
For years I ran tubes. Conrad Johnson then Rogue. 3 years ago I went over to Pass Labs. Same as tubes? Unlikely but I do not miss the tubes even one bit. Pass is that good 
If you don't want the tube hassle, but still want full bodied accurate lifelike sound, then I bet you'll like a McIntosh SS preamp.   The control it can give you over the listening space and inferior recordings is a nice bonus, and has certainly added to my musical enjoyment.  I have used several highly reviewed modern preamps in your price range, tube and SS.  I have a good bit of experience with the preamp you are using now.  As always, YMMV and good luck.

I second Jafant's recommendation of the Levinson 380S.  If you can stretch for a 326S do it.  It's a fantastic preamp.
over the budget but I've owned a lot(too much) high end gear over many years and can't fathom a smoother more detailed preamp than the Krell Phantom, a two box unit. I think the 222 is the single box version. Truly musical. Actually got tipped off by a top Agostino guy when I asked him if you wanted a truly special Krell pre to match w Agostino amp what would you choose. See above. 
Take a listen to the deHavilland UltraVerve. Here is a quote from Jack Roberts review in Dagogo.  
" In conclusion, there is a reason there are so many glowing reviews of this preamp. It is a preamp that is priced like an entry-level preamp and sounds like a true high-end preamp. This is truly a product that offers value in the high-end market. It holds its own with the very best, it’s fun to listen to and has a big robust sound but not at the cost of tonality or detail.....