Vintage DD turntables. Are we living dangerously?
Halcro - yes I agree, Acoustic Plan's view on the importance of wow and flutter is a cop out, particularly for a statement product with a price tag to match. Any improvement in wow and flutter must improve the enjoyment of music per se - musical timing is fundamental. They should shed some of the bling and provide a better drive system. Unfortunately I suspect market demand for bling over substance is a driver these days. Go at stand at an audio show and see how many folk make value statements on performance based solely on looks. |
Hi Halcro, On another thread you indicated that you've transitioned from a metal skeleton metal frame plinth to a solid Granite plinth for your TT-101. From the picture, I didn't see holes in the circular Granite to accomadate hardware for securing the TT-101. Is the TT-101 resting on the Granite without being fasten to the Granite? Â Would you please describe what are the sonic differences? Thank you Norm |
Hi Norm, When I first set up my Victor and armpods, I supported the turntable motor with its own metal shroud on Tiptoes http://i.imgur.com/Xp97BF8.jpg This at first sounded better than most tables I had previously heard but I thought I could do better than this makeshift arrangement. So I designed and had built, a stainless steel cradle http://i.imgur.com/UuEyECm.jpg which had adjustable spike supports and three rubber supporting pads on top to rest the motor assembly http://i.imgur.com/2FH8xGR.jpg This was indeed an improvement in rigidity over the previous model, however after a few years, I discovered that the lightweight nature of this supporting structure allowed for accidental movement of the geometrical relationships vis-a-vis the massive 24lb armpods. So I designed a circular ’plinth’ cut from a single solid block of granite and polished http://i.imgur.com/ouvBGRN.png I lined the inner surface with cork to absorb the electro-magnetic waves bouncing around from the transformer, power supply and motor unit and had the same three rubber ’button’ supports fixed to the top to support the motor unit itself http://i.imgur.com/h673918.jpg The improvement in sound was revelatory and confirmed the fact that Newton’s third law of motion (For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction) applied to the motion of turntables. The centrifugal force of a spinning platter must be resisted by enough ’mass’ to avoid movement. http://i.imgur.com/ddKNHVx.jpg This is more readily seen in a suspended turntable where the centrifugal force is not resisted and must create movement about the sprung suspension. The Kronos turntable with its two counter rotating platters effectively solves this problem for suspended turntables. http://media.tas.zeitpress.com/articles/images/JH%2011%20The%20Kronos%20Sparta%20turntable%20comes%2... With an unsuspended mass-loaded turntable of any kind, that centrifugal force is absorbed and thus resisted by the mass of the supporting structure. The sonic effects of this added mass to the TT-101 in my situation, is a tightening of the presentation together with a relaxed delineation of the entire soundstage and instrumental focus. The detailing snaps sharply and the lower registers plunge solidly with an unwavering pitch and tunefulness. And as a bonus.....the geometrical relationships to the solid bronze armpods remain static 😘 Regards |
Hi Halcro, **The centrifugal force of a spinning platter must be resisted by enough ’mass’ to avoid movement.** Interesting point. Assuming the motor is still coupled with three rubber pads, it's not only the mass of the pod which resists motion, it's also the integrity of the coupling and mass of the motor unit insuring that resistance. I wonder if performance would improve if the motor unit was bolted onto the pod. Regards, |
