Why aren't the older members still active ?


Just curious who is still very active from 2000 and earlier
on this site? I don't get on very often. I guess I have no opinions or my interest lies elsewhere. I remember in the early 2000s there seemed more interesting and heated topics then now. I cannot even get a rise out of anybody for saying "the Beatles where the worse group ever". I think somebody replied " I am a moron" without stating why he thought they were good. I started a thread in Music: Garage Band Hangover, about a website called Garage Hangover, but like 2 people responded. Some of my favs haven't been on in 3 even 5 years. So why is that?
shubertmaniac
I got my first feedback in 2000, so must have lurked here for awhile before that. Didn't start posting until April 2001.

I used to post more often but it seems like most of the replies I've written lately I just delete, as I don't think it adds anything to the topic, plus at times it's the same old thing...

My reasons are personal but would have to agree with some of the other posts that point to the atmosphere in the forums not being conducive to posting more often.
Why don't I post any more? Because Albert didn't include me on his list of missing members. :-(

While apparently not very memorable, I did originally log onto A'gon in 2000 and was an active member for a few years, then went into lurk mode. I reappeared for awhile in 2008 before going back to lurking.

There are four main reasons for the change in my participation level and three of them have already been touched on:

* My system is made up of components that are all well known and that have been thoroughly discussed. Not much new to be learned about them, nor is there a need to change anything.

* The downturn in the economy limited my purchases of all types, especially audio equipment. Putting together a new system a few years ago led to my becoming active for awhile, then the next point kicked in.

* There has been a shift in acceptable "manners" on Internet forums in general. These days I post very little on the Internet as arguing over opinions is a losing proposition.

* But the biggest reason is that the posters here have already taught me everything there is to know about audio gear. ;-) OK, so there's only three reasons...

Seriously, I lurk, swinging by once or twice a week to see what's shaking and to stay on top of what's new in the market. Occasionally I'll pick up a new tip on new music or a tweak to try. I also lied about not wanting to change anything. If an Ars Sonum fell into my lap I'd take it.

BTW, Albert, I'm just having fun with not being on your list. I see a lot of familiar names on this thread, yours among them. Thanks for the chat everyone.
BTW, Albert, I'm just having fun with not being on your list. I see a lot of familiar names on this thread, yours among them. Thanks for the chat everyone.

That's the trouble with getting old, I can't remember all the members that have gone missing :^).

I agree with comment about occasional lack of manners. Still, it's pretty civil at Audiogon compared to other places.

I still learn from member posts, even after all these years. I also enjoy reading about system upgrades and component testing by people here.
I became a member in 2006; I am also 59 years old. One reason I don't post as much is my system is stable. After years of listening, I know what I like so I keep it. I read posts but I don't post very often now. But, I have been known to change my mind, so who knows?

Another reason are all the ones stated above; they are all valid! I'd spring for two JC-1's to replace my Class D amps if the economy was 10x better than it is.

I am also an Analog Circuit designer; I've been designing audio stuff for a long time now. So, a lot of questions that are often asked I simply ignore since my viewpoint is quite different than most of the posters who usually answer. I'd rather let them banter back and forth - an honest factual answer in this case would only destroy the fun!

The last reason I post less often is I find I am sick of the BS in most audio ads - and the BS hasn't changed in the decades since I started in audio. Audiophiles end up being the victims most of the time, which I find disheartening. I use the word "most" here, not all ads or companies BS and there are numerous honest companies out there. But I do believe they are not the majority in terms of ranking by annual sales. Frankly, I don't know how to give an honest answer when the discussion is whether BS argument A is better than BS argument B! One would have to eliminate the BS first to see the real answer. How can one do that????