ZYX Universe, Dynavector XV-1s, vdH Colibri, ??


Last Sunday i finally took the time to compare three cartridges; my Dynavector XV-1s (.24mv output), a friends ZYX Universe (.24mv output) and my vdH Colibri (.85mv output) with the darTZeel preamp and phono stage in battery power.

Some background. in a post from my system thread i describe the path that brought me to be experimenting with various cartridges. that post also raves about listening to battery power with the darTZeel phono stage. i promised to compare the Dynavector and ZYX to the Colibri on battery power.

so that is what i did.

the darTZeel preamp has plenty of gain (62db in the phono stage and 20 db in the gain stage of the pre itself) so even with the relatively low output of the Dynavector and ZYX there are no gain issues at all, i only needed to go to about 2 o'clock on the volume attenuator for very high volume with the 95db efficient VR9 speakers. in battery mode the darTZeel phono stage is extremely quiet; so the normal advantage the Colibri has over other cartridges with lower gain is considerably reduced.

the darTZeel phono stage is set with 100ohm loading that seemed to work well with all the cartridges but is not ideal. i know that the Colibri likes about 400-500 ohms ideally; and from what i understand the Dynavector and ZYX both are ok (if not ideal) around 100 ohms.

the Dynavector is pretty new and only has maybe 30 hours on it; so it has not yet openned up completely. i am told the ZYX is fully broken in......and my Colibri is most definitly broken in.

i am very familiar with the setup parameters of the Colibri. i run it with the arm slightly down at the back, and track it at 1.45 grams as measured by my ALM-01 Winds Electronic Stylus Pressure Gauge. with the Rockport there is no anti-skate issues.

i ran the Dynavector XV-1s at 2.70 grams and slightly down in the rear of the arm.......and the ZYX Universe at 1.95 grams and the arm level.

i had played around previously with the Dynavector for my 30 hours and had had the Universe in the system for about a week prior to get it dialed in. so i had a reasonably good idea of setup on each cartridge.

the Rockport does make it easy to switch cartridges very quickly as all you need to do is change the counterweight to the proper one for the weight of that particular cartridge. then adjust the arm length for exact stylus position (there is a groove in the platter that you sight the stylus exactly inside for perfect position), rotate the arm for visual azimuth (i can get it very very close to perfect), and set your VTF. in practice about a 20 minute job if you already know the VTF you want.

so i was able to first listen to the Colibri, switch quickly to the Universe, listen again, then switch quickly to the XV-1s, and listen again.

before i get into what i heard on Sunday i want to describe my perceptions of how the Dynavector and ZYX compared when i the Universe first arrived from my friend. for reasons described in the previous post i had purchased the Dynavector as an alternative to my Colibri and it had been in my system for about 6 weeks. i had been using my Lamm LP2 Delux phono stage with the Placette passive RVC and Tenor 300 watt Hybrid monoblocks. i liked the Dynavector; compared to the Colibri it was less exciting, less on the edge, less vivid and immediate and less explosive......OTOH although it had a little color it was fairly neutral, always natural, very involving and had very good detail if not quite like the Colibri. more of my favorite music was enjoyable compared to the Colibri.

when i installed the ZYX Universe my first impression was of slightly less smoothness and naturalness compared to the Dynavector but more of the excitement of the Colibri. i played some of the Lps that had been on the edge with the Colibri and the ZYX was more natural and under control yet considerably more exciting than the Dynavector.

on the Lamm/Placette/Tenor my initial impressions were that these were simply two good cartridges that had different perspectives. as i listened more to the ZYX i could never really get fully involved into the music as i had felt with the Dynavector or especially the Colibri. why? i'm not exactly sure. it was like i wasn't hearing as far into the music as i liked. nothing was missing from the 'checklist' but i wasn't fulfilled.

the Lamm has 57.5 db of gain, has 400 ohm loading, and is extremely quiet. it has a very slight warmth, just to the dark side of neutral; but has a textural richness and refinement that i have not heard from any other phono stage (until dart battery power). it should be an ideal match for the ZYX.

so that was how it was before i tried battery power (as described in my previous post). i hope this makes sense up to this point.

now to the three cartridge comparison.

first the Colibri. the Colibri can be a 'train wreck'. it breaks all the rules. the barrel and canteliver are out of algnment with the cartridge 'body'......so setting asthimuth you ignore the body and just align the cateliver and stylus. i have owned 3 Colibris and they are all different yet all inconsistent. they can have any length canteliver a customer wants, gold windings, copper windings, wood bodies, polycarbonite bodies.......they have such little play in their suspensions that they can 'buzz' on certain edgy types of music. they are the Formula 1 cars of cartridges. the Colibri is so immediate, so explosive, yet so natural and so incisive that if all elsewhere is not about perfect.....you will know it and there will be a problem.

OTOH when all is right the Colibri is magnificent.

long story made short; with the battery powered dart phono stage in my system; the Dynavector and especially the ZYX are not nearly in the class of the Colibri. as the system improves, the lead of the Colibri gets larger.

i used tracks on 7 Lps for this comparison.

1.Muddy Waters 'Folk Singer', 'Good Morning School Girl', Classic reissue.

the Colibri here made the guitar plucks real and there. the whole musical sense was vivid and immediate. there was not a sense of the recording chain.....just some guys doing their thing. totally involving. each note dripped with reality. brilliant colors in the vocals and guitar overtones. ALIVE.

with the Universe it sounded great, nothing missing, satisfying. but; the guitar pluck was not as vivid, the colors were less vivid, there was overall a bit of haze that only compared to the Colibri was evidant. maybe no other cartridge would expose that issue. the decay of notes was reduced which reduced the overall involvement. sounded like a different pressing. NOT ALIVE.

on the Dynavector this was more different. less energy, less edge. transients were softened. smoother and warmer. very nice. a great sense of ease but too buttoned down for me. this track should boggie. excellent bloom and note decay.

2. The Royal Ballet, side one, Classic 33rpm reissue.

Colibri; spooky good. i don't want to stop. an 'oh my god' about every 30 seconds. i try to critically listen but it's hard.....i just want to close my eyes and forget about everything. about the best reproduced strings i have ever heard. such a sense of venue, the 'subway' and 'buses' outside seem real. where am i?

ZYX Universe; a different realm......reproduced music. very good.....but less of everything. very, very good. specifically, less separation of instruments, less delicacy
and less clarity. the effortlessness of the Colibri in sorting out the complex textures is missing.

Dynavector; not the detail or energy of the Colibri but very natural. slightly veiled but warm and inviting. not
wholey real but still much beauty. good flow and pulse of the music.

it's getting late; i will continue tomorrow morning or evening as time permits.

the Dynavector and ZYX are excellent cartridges that by themselves are rightly considered SOTA. just because i hear what i hear doesn't invalidate anyone else's perspectives.

so as not to attract too many flames i want to clearly state that i limit my comments to my specific system and setup choices. there are many varibles i have not or cannot address; arms, cartridge loading, breakin, taste, settleing in. i did not do the tiny tweaking of these cartridges that one does over time to dial them in just right. OTOH the differences that i heard are considerable and not subtle.

it just one guys opinion on one particular system on one particular day.

with that said; flame away.
mikelavigne

Showing 21 responses by rauliruegas

Dear Tangram: With out the rumble filter at 30Hz you have one stage less where the critical signal pass through and this help to " clean " the sound and our ears are very sensitive on cymbals reproduced frequencies and that's why you heard this improvement in the quality sound reproduction at those frequencies.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Mike: First than all: it is very grateful to read the findings of a top cartridges evaluation that was made in a full high resolution audio system ( great, great audio system you have. Congratulations !!!!): nothing can hide.

The Colibri is a stellar cartridge but a pain in the ass till we can understand it. We need a lot of patience and know-how.

Mine is in a policarbonite bodie an is the very low output 0.18mv type. The other Colibri that I own ( in the past ) was a 0.65mv that I sold it because I prefer the very low output version: this one is the cartridge type that is not telling you " I'm here ".
Before any one can make a serious evaluation of the Colibri cartridges, we have to wait at least 200 hours of play on it and then send back to VDH for a him-self last " touch ", when the Colibri return to you and only then: you will know why I say that this cartridge is a " stellar one ". This " last touch " is for free, you only do the shipping payment to VDH.

Mike it is unfortunatelly that the XV-1 had only 30 hours of use and, in my opinion, that was set up at 2.7grs on VTF. Why?: this is an e-mail that I run directly to Dynavector and the answer from the Dynavector Technical Director:

At 01:09 05/08/31, you wrote:
>Dear friends: I own the awesome XV-1 and a DV-505 too. I read somewhere that this cartridge have a better performance if we use a VTF of 2.7 gr.
>Before I change to this VTF I would like to know if this high VTF don't compromise: a centered coils, tracking, suspension degradation on the long run, etc, etc.
>
>What do you think about? I really appreciate your advise. It is very important to me.
>Best regards.
>Raul.

Dear Raul,

Thank you for your using DV products.

DV cartridges can secure sufficient performance when using recommended tracking force motioned on the manual. It is true that Higher tracking force can improve the tracking performance at the high amplitude track of the record but too higher tracking force might cause the problem with frequency response as upper side of the damper rubber is compressed by the coil bobbin and downside of the damper rubber is detach from the coil bobbin.

We advise 2.5g would be reasonable maximum tracking force for the XV-1s.

Tracking ability of the XV-1s is slightly changed by room temperature. It means that when you use the cartridge in cold room, you should increase tracking force a little than the XV-1s recommended tracking force of 2.0g, when you use cartridge in hot room you should decrease tracking force.

Hopefully it could be helpful to you.

Best regards,

Masaaki Sasa
Sales and Technical director
Dynavector Systems Ltd.

Mike I respect you experience, dedication and love for the music and for the audio hobby, but I differ on my own findings with yours: the XV-1 is a lot better that your findings, it does not have the inmediacy and explosiveness of the Colibri but; for me in my system for my music priorities, it has all the >Colibri characteristics in a more natural way.
It is a very hard choice, here it is only which one fit better with our music priotities: that's all. There is no winner, both are winners.

Maybe I differ in my findings because my XV-1 is fully broke-in, I use between 2.4 and 2.5 grs and is mated with the best match/tonearm that I can find for it till today ( and of course a different audio room/system )

About the ZYX, everybody know my opinion about ( that you confirm ): no more comments on it.

Tks for share your valuable evaluation with these top performers cartridges.
For me, your thread is a confirmation of my experiences and give me a new light for further analog findings. Tks again.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Sirspeedy: Lovely the DV 507MK2, unfortunately it can't give me a real improvement over my DV 505.

Btw, I think that a very good match for the Coral could be the Ikeda IT 407, over the Phantom, the 507 or any other tonearm.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Mike: Btw, the only 30 hours on your XV-1 is a good notice because that means that you should wait for further improvements in the quality sound reproduction of this great Dynavector cartridge.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Thomas: As an owner of two Coilbri cartridges and a Frog one, I can tell you that them have reliability and Dr. VDH is really good about customer service.
Many customer problems with the Colibri cartridges have more to do with the right set up on it, the breack-in time ( at least 150 hours ), the tonearm which were matched and the kind of audio system we have: the Colibri isa tool: it can tell you several " things " that are wrong or fine in your system. If we have the music-audio experience about cartridges like the Colibri are very well welcomed at home. This is not a cartridge for normal audiophiles or whealthy-amateurs ( I'm not saying that you are. )

Both of my Colibri cartridges and one for a friend of mine were really outstanding.
The Colibri is a cartridge where you or anyone has to understand it an have to have the patience for obtain the best on it: yes, it is not a very user friendly cartridge but like Mike said: " OTOH when all is right the Colibri is magnificent. "

The evaluation that Mike explain in this thread was not with the Lamm preamp but with the darTZeel preamp that does not have any gain problem.
Btw, I respect Lamm products but at that Lamm price is incredible that is using SUT. This internal step-up transformer preclude any serious cartridge evaluation.

Mike nice to see that you are trying a phonopream with out SUT: great!!!!!!

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Jsquattrin: +++++ " , I feel that the type of arm and phono stage is so critical that all of my results could be reversed with different components. " +++++

This is tottaly true and I agree with. The advantage with Mike's system is, like I alredy post it, that nothing can hide.

My experience told me that with a lesser systems, like yours and mine, even a lesser cartridge ( like the ZYX ) can perform at the same level or even at higher level that the best ones cartridges. That kind of products hide their faults behind the several veils on a lesser systems. When our systems have improvements over the time ( more resolution and less veils. ) those lesser cartridges can't any more hide behind our new system and the best ones now will shine and show their qualities.

Yes, the Colibri is not an user friendly cartridge but, like Mike told us: " OTOH when all is right the Colibri is magnificent. ".

I want to tell you than in three times: three times I have to send one of my Colibri's to VDH because I bend the cantilever. My Colibri weight is only 2.5 grs. hard to handle it. Well I think that now I already learn about.
The XV-1 is an open frame too, fortunately I don't have any problem ( yet ) about.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Thomasheisig: +++++ " The Cartridge load is in my opinion a very tricky influence when you want to rate a cartridge. " +++++

Yes, I agree with that and I always support that statement.
My statement about is that the load impedance has to be what the manufacturer recomended, in this way we can almost sure that the frequency response will be flat. I don't agree with your 47K load im`pedance subject: this kind of load do a severe modification on the high frequency cartridge response, of course there are cartridges where the manufacturer recomended the 47K and in these ones it is ok.

The Mike's evaluation at 100 Ohms is almost valid, yes we could be more rigorous about and I'm sure that in the future Mike can do it.

I know very well your Klyne phonopreamp and I like it, Steve is a designer that I respect and his products are well designed and well made.

I agree with you, too, about the gain for a low output cartridge, this is a critical issue because this kind of cartridges needs a high gain with out noise and distortions: these are targets very hard to reach at the same time. Btw, the tube technology can't do it, no question about.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear friends: I love to speak about the XV-1, not only for it great performance but because between the great top quality cartridges is the one that have the best price/performance ratio.

Example: the Colibri, Universe, Titan, Myabi, Koetsu RSP, Clearaudio Insider, Allaerts, Transfiguration, Ikeda, etc, etc.. All these cartridge have a higher retail price than the XV-1, so here we are talking of a " best cartridge bargain " at this special performance level: this is an additional XV-1 advantage over the other cartridges. Don't you think?

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear friends: I love to speak about the XV-1, not only for it great performance but because between the great top quality cartridges is the one that have the best price/performance ratio.

Example: the Colibri, Universe, Titan, Myabi, Koetsu RSP, Clearaudio Insider, Allaerts, Transfiguration, Ikeda, etc, etc.. All these cartridge have a higher retail price than the XV-1, so here we are talking of a " best cartridge bargain " at this special performance level: this is an additional XV-1 advantage over the other cartridges. Don't you think?

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Sirspeedy: +++++ " My point is that ANY cartridge should be able to be found at a good sized discount,and new.The list prices,from my own experience,are like those on jewelry items. " *****

I totally agree with you. The problem with some cartridge manufacturers is that they have to " live " with the low amount of cartridges that they sale, so they have to make big money with any single unit they sold and they have to give big money to their dealers too.
As a fact to build a Coral or any other cartridge it takes no more than 400-500 dollars, maybe less.

Yes, this is the same like the cables. Any of you open ( I already do it in many of my cables )your cables and you will ve heavy surprised how every cable manufacturer is stilling us ( robery ). It is not a manufacturer fault that want to do business it is our fault, our stupid attitude about cables, our stupid attitude about the cables reviews, our no non-sense and no know-how about.

The same is for cartridges: we have nothing bvut what we " deserves " with our comercial no-sense attitude. That's all.

Btw, you can find the XV-1 new for no more than 2.7K.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Thomasheisig: I agree with you.

Btw, that H.Pearson review was the worst I " read " on my life, starting for the load impedance that that " guru " choose for all cartridges: 47K. There were many other misconceptions about tonearm/cartridge subjects on that review: I write several times to TAS about and they never publish any single word about my compliants and never give me an answer.

That " guru " is all you want to think but an audio guru, not only for that review but for many other things like: he choose tube amplifiers for handle the sub-bass towers in the Exotica speakers system !!!!!!!!

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Doug: I respect to Salvatore specially for his constant support to his web site, but it is not my cup of tea. I agree with Neil and Sirspeedy about him.

+++++ " Actually he's the one who first got us to try a ZYX. Our ears confirmed what he reported at the R100 Fuji - Shelter 901 level. " +++++

Well, both of you were wrong about. I remember when you speak a lot ( high praise ) about the 901, in that time ( months ago ) I told you that the 901 was a cartridge in the hi-fi quality sound side, you always answer that the 901 was a great one and don't agree with my findings. Months latter you agree with .

The 901 and ZYX are impressive cartridges at " first impresions "/short time, over the time the " gold " change to cooper. Like everything: the time puts everything in the place where belongs.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Sirspeedy: +++++ " I have finished having an extensive listening of the UNIVERSE,as of now,over a six hour listening session,with two WONDERFUL fellow hobbyists. " +++++

With all my respect to you: extensive listening? six hours?, come on: I know that your audio/music standards are different for mine but I never imagine what/how bigger were our differences. If for

Btw, you that six hours was a " extensive listening ", then I really have to make a stop in my audio development and think in that " six extensive hours " !!!!!!!!!

With two Wonderful fellow.., this tell me that what you had was an " audio party ( great audio fun ) " but not a serious cartridge evaluation ( it does not matters how serious you think that party was ) and I'm not saying you are not a serious music lover/audiophile. A serious audio device evaluation is a personal/alone " party " with out any single wonderful fellow..., at least these are my standards. I now know that yours are extremly different and that is fine for me and I think fine for you.

If the argument is OVER.... that is a dissapointment for me about you. No problem be happy.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Sirspeedy: No, I'm not saying that you and your friends were " drunk ", sorry for the wrong sense of my english.

+++++ " Now, why I take so serious this Mike's thread, well here we are talking of
almost " the best of the best " about cartridges ( well we need here at
least the Allaerts ) that have a jewelery price and we have a responsibility
with all the people on this forum that are looking for trusty information
not only a very " first impression ", "+++++

I think that you miss my point.

+++++ " MY ONLY purpose of reporting the listening session(I was visiting relatives,near this nice "owner's house") I had, was for "mere" entertainment value.As, in a "FUN" read!!I'm sorry I mentioned any of it,since it seems to upset you.I don't take myself as seriously as you may think, " +++++

This is the difference and no I don't have any club, my " club " is to try to help other audio people with a honest and experienced opinions ( I'm not saying that yours are not ). I have a compromise with the music, that's all.

New Bernings?, this explain about. Happy " equalization " !!!!

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.


Dear Sirspeedy: +++++ " YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS"!!! " +++++

Yes, I'm and I don't quit because there is nothing that tell that I have to
quit about, let me to explain:

I already told you that your standards are diferent for mine ( that is
normal. different music experience, differents " ears ", different audio
system, etc, etc.. ). How I do a " serious " audio device evaluation:

- first, I make it alone with out any one in my audio system area.

- second, I play/heard the system by periods between one to two hours, no
more.

- third, I play/heard the system in at least 3 to 5 periods in two to three
days ( sometimes more, it depends of what I'm evaluating and if the audio
device is mine or borrowed from a dealer or a friend ) at different
times/hours.

Why periods of one to two hours?, well for any people is really hard to stay
in deep concentration for more time and other important issue is that after
that time our brain/ears are " equalized/accustom " to the sound of the
audio device and we can't be objectively about.
You have to give time to your ears/brain to " desintoxicate " .

- fourth, I don't drink any liquor during the evaluation periods ( this is
not an audio party and I don't think that you and your friends drink only
water for six hours on a row, but could be. )

With this evaluation ( there are more things about ) approach, six hours in
three periods could be considered " extensive " against six hours on a row
that could be considered ?: you name it.

Till today I already was in front of the ZYX cartridges in four different
times, in three of them I follow that listening approach. For those ZYX
owners I don't want to repeat or to post the other people post that agree
with my opinion about these cartridges: I always said that the ZYX are good
cartridge but that the ZYX are not excellent cartridges, not yet: when this
could happen I will be a proud owner of those future ZYX cartridges, that's
all.

Any experience audiophile can tell us in 10-15 minutes if what he is
listening is right, is wrong or so so, this I name " first impression " and
over the time the main issues on that " first impression " could be change
in a deep evaluation: in this deep/extensive evaluation we could know why
our first impression was a good one/wrong/so so,/etc, etc..

This is part of my standards. For an experienced people the first impression
is really important because if what we are hearing is wrong, this wrong
problem can't change over the time, over the time we could know why is wrong
that's all.

Now, Mike write this thread where he take more than a week to do his
cartridge evaluations in his own ( marvelous ) audio system where he knows
anything about the quality sound that comes for. The Colibri is his
cartridge standard, he had the ZYX for a week before he dial in and the
Dynavector for more than 30 hours. Well this is " extensive " against your
six hours on a row.

Now, why I take so serious this Mike's thread, well here we are talking of
almost " the best of the best " about cartridges ( well we need here at
least the Allaerts ) that have a jewelery price and we have a responsibility
with all the people on this forum that are looking for trusty information
not only a very " first impression ", at least this is my opinion. Yes I
know that for you the argument is over, like I already told you: good for
you, for me and for any one.

We are not losting here anything ( at least not me ), I think that all of us
learn many things about.

Great thread Mike.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Mike: Now, that your XV-1 is fully broke-in ( I think but I'm not sure ) can you give us your experiences about.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear S23chang: I have experience with the Frog but not with the ones that you named.
Now, the Colibri comes too in a medium output version where you will not have problems in your system.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear friends: +++++ " But the plain truth is that Larry's Graham could not match the transparency of any Schroeder or the microdynamics of a TriPlanar VII. The worst possible mis-adjustment of anti-skating could not account for the performance margin agreed to by everyone who actually heard them side by side. " +++++

This statement from Doug tell us that we are " seeing " three totally different tonearm design, every one with its " highs " and " downs " ( nothing is perfect ).

+++++ " We did not like it with a Koetsu, " +++++

I agree with Doug, the 2.2 is not the best match for the Koetsu cartridges. I agree too that the worst ( and I understand that was not the worst one ), mis-adjustment in AS...., in this aspect I agree with Teres too.

Now, if we want to be very serious and strict about then Sirspeedy is right: the AS must be dialed perfect for a true evaluation.

For me, what I learn with this kind of " opinion fights " ?

- first, that any cartridge has to match with the " matched " tonearm: 2.2/Transfiguration.

- second, that exist tonearms that are more " universal " than others: Reference and Triplanar against the 2.2

- third, that there is no " best " tonearm, what exist is a best combination: tonearm/cartridge.

- fourth, that an " audio party " is a real and great fun ( I have it every single week here ), but nothing more than that.

-five, that you all are really great audiophiles that always think " I'm right " ( me too ). I know that I'm not always right, do you?

Tks for your " friendly audio fight ". This let me confirm my " old " opinion/experiences/subjects about.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Dgad: The Condor, like the Colibri, has different music sound presentation over the XV-1, like you already heard it.

Your XV-1 needs at least another 60 hours and your Condor, I think , is near the time that you have to send to Van denHul for the " final touch " and yes if your Condor sits unused for many days then you have to " start " the break in for a few more hours>: maybe ten.

I don't know which could be the issue with your Ikeda tonearm, if you like e-mail me and maybe I can help you about, I yest try the XV-1 with my Ikeda and is a very good couple " fighters " .

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear Dgad: +++++ " are mentioning it even goes as far as the phono preamp itself will have a lot to do with the sound of the cartridge " +++++

When the minuscle signal from a cartridge has to be amplified this responsability is of the phonopreamp. This phonopreamp has to do it with out degradation to that critical cartridge signal, it must to do with accuracy for mimic the RIAA eq. ( inverse ), with out this accurate RIAA you have nothing but a " corrupted signal ". Then the phonopreamp must be amplified the signal with out noise and distortion free. All these subjects are extremly critical and a real challenge and many people does not care about when are even more important than the signal it self. The phonopreamp, in my opinion, is a lot more important link that what the audio people think about.
Dgad, you are right on your statement.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.